Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data

In sequential tests, typically a (pairwise) multiple comparison procedure (MCP) is performed after an omnibus test (an overall equality test). In general, when an omnibus test (e.g., overall equality of multiple proportions test) is rejected, then we further conduct a (pairwise) multiple comparisons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dewi Rahardja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Stats
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/3/1/6
id doaj-8ee8240d82694da9805a747e10942133
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ee8240d82694da9805a747e109421332020-11-25T02:10:34ZengMDPI AGStats2571-905X2020-03-0131566710.3390/stats3010006stats3010006Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial DataDewi Rahardja0U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Meade, MD 20755, USAIn sequential tests, typically a (pairwise) multiple comparison procedure (MCP) is performed after an omnibus test (an overall equality test). In general, when an omnibus test (e.g., overall equality of multiple proportions test) is rejected, then we further conduct a (pairwise) multiple comparisons or MCPs to determine which (e.g., proportions) pairs the significant differences came from. In this article, via likelihood-based approaches, we acquire three confidence intervals (CIs) for comparing each pairwise proportion difference in the presence of over-reported binomial data. Our closed-form algorithm is easy to implement. As a result, for multiple-sample proportions differences, we can easily apply MCP adjustment methods (e.g., Bonferroni, Šidák, and Dunn) to address the multiplicity issue, unlike previous literatures. We illustrate our procedures to a real data example.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/3/1/6multiple comparison procedure (mcp)pairwise comparisonsbinary datadouble samplingmisclassificationmultiple-sampleproportions difference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dewi Rahardja
spellingShingle Dewi Rahardja
Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
Stats
multiple comparison procedure (mcp)
pairwise comparisons
binary data
double sampling
misclassification
multiple-sample
proportions difference
author_facet Dewi Rahardja
author_sort Dewi Rahardja
title Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
title_short Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
title_full Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
title_fullStr Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Comparison Procedures for the Differences of Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Multiple-Sample Binomial Data
title_sort multiple comparison procedures for the differences of proportion parameters in over-reported multiple-sample binomial data
publisher MDPI AG
series Stats
issn 2571-905X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In sequential tests, typically a (pairwise) multiple comparison procedure (MCP) is performed after an omnibus test (an overall equality test). In general, when an omnibus test (e.g., overall equality of multiple proportions test) is rejected, then we further conduct a (pairwise) multiple comparisons or MCPs to determine which (e.g., proportions) pairs the significant differences came from. In this article, via likelihood-based approaches, we acquire three confidence intervals (CIs) for comparing each pairwise proportion difference in the presence of over-reported binomial data. Our closed-form algorithm is easy to implement. As a result, for multiple-sample proportions differences, we can easily apply MCP adjustment methods (e.g., Bonferroni, Šidák, and Dunn) to address the multiplicity issue, unlike previous literatures. We illustrate our procedures to a real data example.
topic multiple comparison procedure (mcp)
pairwise comparisons
binary data
double sampling
misclassification
multiple-sample
proportions difference
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/3/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT dewirahardja multiplecomparisonproceduresforthedifferencesofproportionparametersinoverreportedmultiplesamplebinomialdata
_version_ 1724918889759899648