Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial

Background: Several techniques and devices have been described for circumcision each with its own pros and cons. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of neonatal circumcision between bone-cutter and plastibell devices at our institution. Methods: This is a randomized trial (unre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ademola Olusegun Talabi, Gabriel Unimke Udie, Oludayo Adedapo Sowande, Owolabi Oni, Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EL-Med-Pub 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/ojs/index.php/jns/article/view/549
id doaj-8ef22345a3a44b97bcd32371a507222f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ef22345a3a44b97bcd32371a507222f2020-11-25T04:08:28ZengEL-Med-PubJournal of Neonatal Surgery2226-04392020-11-01910.47338/jns.v9.549Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trialAdemola Olusegun Talabi0Gabriel Unimke Udie1Oludayo Adedapo Sowande2Owolabi Oni3Olusanya Adejuyigbe4Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University/Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NigeriaDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NigeriaDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NigeriaDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NigeriaDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria Background: Several techniques and devices have been described for circumcision each with its own pros and cons. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of neonatal circumcision between bone-cutter and plastibell devices at our institution. Methods: This is a randomized trial (unregistered) conducted at the Pediatric Surgical Unit of a tertiary teaching hospital situated in a semi-urban setting, between January 2019 and December 2019. The uncircumcised neonates underwent circumcision by either bone-cutter or plastibell device. Demographic characteristics, operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The age ranged between 7 days and 30 days with a mean of 15.9±5.5 days. The mean age and weight of both groups were well matched (p >0.05). The operative time in the bone cutter technique was 4.2±0.9 minutes compared to 5.8±1.2 minutes in the plastibell device method (p <0.001). Blood loss was lesser with bone cutter (0.27 ±0.32mls versus 0.51 ±0.44mls in the plastibell device, p <0.001). The complication rates were comparable in both study groups (p =1.000). The overall complication rate was 5.8%. The penile perception score and the Hollander wound evaluation score for bone-cutter were 15.7±0.8 and 5.7±0.84 while in the plastibell device were 15.4±1.1 and 5.4±1.1, respectively (p >0.05). Conclusion: Operative time and blood loss were less with bone cutter compared to plastibell device. However, the complication rate, penile perception score, and Hollander wound evaluation scores were similar. https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/ojs/index.php/jns/article/view/549Bone cutterPlastibellCircumcisionNeonate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ademola Olusegun Talabi
Gabriel Unimke Udie
Oludayo Adedapo Sowande
Owolabi Oni
Olusanya Adejuyigbe
spellingShingle Ademola Olusegun Talabi
Gabriel Unimke Udie
Oludayo Adedapo Sowande
Owolabi Oni
Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Bone cutter
Plastibell
Circumcision
Neonate
author_facet Ademola Olusegun Talabi
Gabriel Unimke Udie
Oludayo Adedapo Sowande
Owolabi Oni
Olusanya Adejuyigbe
author_sort Ademola Olusegun Talabi
title Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
title_short Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
title_full Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
title_fullStr Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: A randomized trial
title_sort bone cutter versus plastibell device in neonatal circumcision: a randomized trial
publisher EL-Med-Pub
series Journal of Neonatal Surgery
issn 2226-0439
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Background: Several techniques and devices have been described for circumcision each with its own pros and cons. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of neonatal circumcision between bone-cutter and plastibell devices at our institution. Methods: This is a randomized trial (unregistered) conducted at the Pediatric Surgical Unit of a tertiary teaching hospital situated in a semi-urban setting, between January 2019 and December 2019. The uncircumcised neonates underwent circumcision by either bone-cutter or plastibell device. Demographic characteristics, operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The age ranged between 7 days and 30 days with a mean of 15.9±5.5 days. The mean age and weight of both groups were well matched (p >0.05). The operative time in the bone cutter technique was 4.2±0.9 minutes compared to 5.8±1.2 minutes in the plastibell device method (p <0.001). Blood loss was lesser with bone cutter (0.27 ±0.32mls versus 0.51 ±0.44mls in the plastibell device, p <0.001). The complication rates were comparable in both study groups (p =1.000). The overall complication rate was 5.8%. The penile perception score and the Hollander wound evaluation score for bone-cutter were 15.7±0.8 and 5.7±0.84 while in the plastibell device were 15.4±1.1 and 5.4±1.1, respectively (p >0.05). Conclusion: Operative time and blood loss were less with bone cutter compared to plastibell device. However, the complication rate, penile perception score, and Hollander wound evaluation scores were similar.
topic Bone cutter
Plastibell
Circumcision
Neonate
url https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/ojs/index.php/jns/article/view/549
work_keys_str_mv AT ademolaoluseguntalabi bonecutterversusplastibelldeviceinneonatalcircumcisionarandomizedtrial
AT gabrielunimkeudie bonecutterversusplastibelldeviceinneonatalcircumcisionarandomizedtrial
AT oludayoadedaposowande bonecutterversusplastibelldeviceinneonatalcircumcisionarandomizedtrial
AT owolabioni bonecutterversusplastibelldeviceinneonatalcircumcisionarandomizedtrial
AT olusanyaadejuyigbe bonecutterversusplastibelldeviceinneonatalcircumcisionarandomizedtrial
_version_ 1724425667415638016