Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to ot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina H. Di Cara, Andy Boyd, Alastair R. Tanner, Tarek Al Baghal, Lisa Calderwood, Luke S. Sloan, Oliver S. P. Davis, Claire M. A. Haworth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wellcome 2020-08-01
Series:Wellcome Open Research
Online Access:https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-44/v2
id doaj-8f1a830ab6264e5e891506b66b8c8050
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f1a830ab6264e5e891506b66b8c80502020-11-25T03:45:06ZengWellcomeWellcome Open Research2398-502X2020-08-01510.12688/wellcomeopenres.15755.217818Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]Nina H. Di Cara0Andy Boyd1Alastair R. Tanner2Tarek Al Baghal3Lisa Calderwood4Luke S. Sloan5Oliver S. P. Davis6Claire M. A. Haworth7MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM, BS8 2BN, UKDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UKDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UKInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UKCentre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, London, WC1H 0NU, UKSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UKDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UKSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UKBackground: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to other longitudinal data, may give participants a unique perspective on the acceptability of this growing research area. Methods: Two focus groups explored participant views towards the acceptability and best practice for the collection of social media data for research purposes. Participants were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort; individuals from the index cohort of young people (N=9) and from the parent generation (N=5) took part in two separate 90-minute focus groups. The discussions were audio recorded and subjected to qualitative analysis. Results: Participants were generally supportive of the collection of social media data to facilitate health and social research. They felt that their trust in the cohort study would encourage them to do so. Concern was expressed about the collection of data from friends or connections who had not consented. In terms of best practice for collecting the data, participants generally preferred the use of anonymous data derived from social media to be shared with researchers. Conclusion: Cohort studies have trusting relationships with their participants; for this relationship to extend to linking their social media data with longitudinal information, procedural safeguards are needed. Participants understand the goals and potential of research integrating social media data into cohort studies, but further research is required on the acquisition of their friend’s data. The views gathered from participants provide important guidance for future work seeking to integrate social media in cohort studies.https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-44/v2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nina H. Di Cara
Andy Boyd
Alastair R. Tanner
Tarek Al Baghal
Lisa Calderwood
Luke S. Sloan
Oliver S. P. Davis
Claire M. A. Haworth
spellingShingle Nina H. Di Cara
Andy Boyd
Alastair R. Tanner
Tarek Al Baghal
Lisa Calderwood
Luke S. Sloan
Oliver S. P. Davis
Claire M. A. Haworth
Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Wellcome Open Research
author_facet Nina H. Di Cara
Andy Boyd
Alastair R. Tanner
Tarek Al Baghal
Lisa Calderwood
Luke S. Sloan
Oliver S. P. Davis
Claire M. A. Haworth
author_sort Nina H. Di Cara
title Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a uk cohort study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher Wellcome
series Wellcome Open Research
issn 2398-502X
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to other longitudinal data, may give participants a unique perspective on the acceptability of this growing research area. Methods: Two focus groups explored participant views towards the acceptability and best practice for the collection of social media data for research purposes. Participants were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort; individuals from the index cohort of young people (N=9) and from the parent generation (N=5) took part in two separate 90-minute focus groups. The discussions were audio recorded and subjected to qualitative analysis. Results: Participants were generally supportive of the collection of social media data to facilitate health and social research. They felt that their trust in the cohort study would encourage them to do so. Concern was expressed about the collection of data from friends or connections who had not consented. In terms of best practice for collecting the data, participants generally preferred the use of anonymous data derived from social media to be shared with researchers. Conclusion: Cohort studies have trusting relationships with their participants; for this relationship to extend to linking their social media data with longitudinal information, procedural safeguards are needed. Participants understand the goals and potential of research integrating social media data into cohort studies, but further research is required on the acquisition of their friend’s data. The views gathered from participants provide important guidance for future work seeking to integrate social media in cohort studies.
url https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-44/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT ninahdicara viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT andyboyd viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT alastairrtanner viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT tarekalbaghal viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT lisacalderwood viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT lukessloan viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT oliverspdavis viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
AT clairemahaworth viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudyversion2peerreview2approved
_version_ 1724511414027026432