Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Background: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has been described for pain management following abdominal surgery in adults, but there are only few reports on its use in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided TAP block in patients schedul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2014-10-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184914000671
id doaj-8f29f8a077fd4da6b388146849a88afb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f29f8a077fd4da6b388146849a88afb2020-11-25T02:19:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492014-10-0130437738210.1016/j.egja.2014.06.005Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trialAhmad Ramzy ShaabanBackground: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has been described for pain management following abdominal surgery in adults, but there are only few reports on its use in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided TAP block in patients scheduled for open appendectomy versus an active comparator (wound infiltration). Methods: Forty-four children aged 4–16 years (ASA 1–2) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups (22 in each). Patients in group (T) were assigned to receive ultrasound guided TAP block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, and those in group (L) were assigned to receive local infiltration by the surgeon. Maximum pain scores, the time to the first analgesic requirement and the number of analgesic requirements were recorded over 48 h. Results: The ultrasound guided TAP block increased the mean time to the first analgesic requirement (10.4 ± 1.5 h) in comparison with the local infiltration group (5.4 ± 1.5). The cumulative number of doses of analgesic was significantly lower in TAP group than in local infiltration group (3.7 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.1) and the Pain Scale score was significantly lower in the TAP group over the study period. Besides, there were no complications attributable to the ultrasound guided TAP block. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block with (0.4 ml/kg) 0.25% bupivacaine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic use without any clinical side-effects after appendectomy in children.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184914000671UltrasoundTAP blockPaediatrics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
spellingShingle Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Ultrasound
TAP block
Paediatrics
author_facet Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
author_sort Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
title Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1110-1849
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Background: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has been described for pain management following abdominal surgery in adults, but there are only few reports on its use in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided TAP block in patients scheduled for open appendectomy versus an active comparator (wound infiltration). Methods: Forty-four children aged 4–16 years (ASA 1–2) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups (22 in each). Patients in group (T) were assigned to receive ultrasound guided TAP block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, and those in group (L) were assigned to receive local infiltration by the surgeon. Maximum pain scores, the time to the first analgesic requirement and the number of analgesic requirements were recorded over 48 h. Results: The ultrasound guided TAP block increased the mean time to the first analgesic requirement (10.4 ± 1.5 h) in comparison with the local infiltration group (5.4 ± 1.5). The cumulative number of doses of analgesic was significantly lower in TAP group than in local infiltration group (3.7 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.1) and the Pain Scale score was significantly lower in the TAP group over the study period. Besides, there were no complications attributable to the ultrasound guided TAP block. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block with (0.4 ml/kg) 0.25% bupivacaine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic use without any clinical side-effects after appendectomy in children.
topic Ultrasound
TAP block
Paediatrics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184914000671
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadramzyshaaban ultrasoundguidedtransversusabdominisplaneblockversuslocalwoundinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingappendectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724879029603926016