Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities

In February 2015, Slovakia held a referendum ʻfor the protection of the traditional family.ʼ It was indirectly aimed against the potential legalization of same-sex marriages or civil unions. Owing to the initiative of the Slovak President, the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic (CCSR) revie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marián Sekerák
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2017-01-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.340/
id doaj-8f613e3c1f794d9b9f53b1b8469f3559
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f613e3c1f794d9b9f53b1b8469f35592020-11-25T02:59:57ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2017-01-01131345910.18352/ulr.340338Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilitiesMarián Sekerák0Charles University in PragueIn February 2015, Slovakia held a referendum ʻfor the protection of the traditional family.ʼ It was indirectly aimed against the potential legalization of same-sex marriages or civil unions. Owing to the initiative of the Slovak President, the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic (CCSR) reviewed four proposed referendum questions, while one of them was later declared unconstitutional. I attempt to point out the flaws in the CCSR’s judgment while looking for an argumentation in favour of the recognition of same-sex marriages/civil unions. I argue that Slovak constitutional law provides several principles for such recognition, which include: civic equality, similarity, equal access, democratic state, and the right to privacy. These principles are compared with the recent ground-breaking judgments of the US Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, I briefly scrutinise the objection that recognising a right for same-sex unions means excessive judicial activism and judicializes politics.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.340/same-sex marriagescivil unionsregistered partnershipsSlovak ConstitutionEuropean Court of Human RightsConstitutional Court of the Slovak Republic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marián Sekerák
spellingShingle Marián Sekerák
Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
Utrecht Law Review
same-sex marriages
civil unions
registered partnerships
Slovak Constitution
European Court of Human Rights
Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic
author_facet Marián Sekerák
author_sort Marián Sekerák
title Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
title_short Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
title_full Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
title_fullStr Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
title_full_unstemmed Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities
title_sort same-sex marriages (or civil unions/registered partnerships) in slovak constitutional law: challenges and possibilities
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description In February 2015, Slovakia held a referendum ʻfor the protection of the traditional family.ʼ It was indirectly aimed against the potential legalization of same-sex marriages or civil unions. Owing to the initiative of the Slovak President, the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic (CCSR) reviewed four proposed referendum questions, while one of them was later declared unconstitutional. I attempt to point out the flaws in the CCSR’s judgment while looking for an argumentation in favour of the recognition of same-sex marriages/civil unions. I argue that Slovak constitutional law provides several principles for such recognition, which include: civic equality, similarity, equal access, democratic state, and the right to privacy. These principles are compared with the recent ground-breaking judgments of the US Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, I briefly scrutinise the objection that recognising a right for same-sex unions means excessive judicial activism and judicializes politics.
topic same-sex marriages
civil unions
registered partnerships
Slovak Constitution
European Court of Human Rights
Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.340/
work_keys_str_mv AT mariansekerak samesexmarriagesorcivilunionsregisteredpartnershipsinslovakconstitutionallawchallengesandpossibilities
_version_ 1724700082620596224