Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film

<p>My contribution aims to modify current concepts of unreliable narration in literature and film. Although in film studies it is more common to talk of mind-game movies, this notion is not synonymous with unreliable narration: mind-game movies are films which question (the perception of) real...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sabine Schlickers
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bergische Universität Wuppertal 2015-06-01
Series:Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
Online Access:https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/190
id doaj-8f9f1db9901c4a7393b48664c8f980b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8f9f1db9901c4a7393b48664c8f980b32020-11-24T23:48:50ZdeuBergische Universität WuppertalDiegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung2195-21162015-06-0141206Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und FilmSabine Schlickers<p>My contribution aims to modify current concepts of unreliable narration in literature and film. Although in film studies it is more common to talk of mind-game movies, this notion is not synonymous with unreliable narration: mind-game movies are films which question (the perception of) reality through the deployment of  various specific ambiguities, whereas unreliable narration excludes – in my definition – the ambiguity by using an unexpected plot twist. In order to account for all narrative techniques which produce strange effects and call attention to themselves, I introduce the new concept of perturbatory narration. Conceived of as a transmedial and transgeneric mode of narration, this umbrella term includes the interplay of unreliable and paradoxical narration (i.e. metalepsis, certain forms of <em>mise en abyme</em>, self-begetting novels, Möbius strips etc.), explicit metafiction as well as Fantastic Narration. Each of these disturbs the reader’s or viewer’s process of orientation within the fictional world, which can result in either stronger immersion or, on the contrary, a breach of the aesthetic illusion. Based on a typology of unreliable narration, my analysis of three films of the <em>new Argentine cinema</em> aims to show this typology’s validity, but also its limits: elements of the paradoxical and fantastic which are intertwined with the unreliable narration point to  the necessity of a new, broader narratological concept, one which could then be described as perturbatory narration.</p>https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/190
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sabine Schlickers
spellingShingle Sabine Schlickers
Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
author_facet Sabine Schlickers
author_sort Sabine Schlickers
title Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
title_short Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
title_full Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
title_fullStr Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
title_full_unstemmed Lüge, Täuschung und Verwirrung. Unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes Erzählen‘ in Literatur und Film
title_sort lüge, täuschung und verwirrung. unzuverlässiges und ‚verstörendes erzählen‘ in literatur und film
publisher Bergische Universität Wuppertal
series Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
issn 2195-2116
publishDate 2015-06-01
description <p>My contribution aims to modify current concepts of unreliable narration in literature and film. Although in film studies it is more common to talk of mind-game movies, this notion is not synonymous with unreliable narration: mind-game movies are films which question (the perception of) reality through the deployment of  various specific ambiguities, whereas unreliable narration excludes – in my definition – the ambiguity by using an unexpected plot twist. In order to account for all narrative techniques which produce strange effects and call attention to themselves, I introduce the new concept of perturbatory narration. Conceived of as a transmedial and transgeneric mode of narration, this umbrella term includes the interplay of unreliable and paradoxical narration (i.e. metalepsis, certain forms of <em>mise en abyme</em>, self-begetting novels, Möbius strips etc.), explicit metafiction as well as Fantastic Narration. Each of these disturbs the reader’s or viewer’s process of orientation within the fictional world, which can result in either stronger immersion or, on the contrary, a breach of the aesthetic illusion. Based on a typology of unreliable narration, my analysis of three films of the <em>new Argentine cinema</em> aims to show this typology’s validity, but also its limits: elements of the paradoxical and fantastic which are intertwined with the unreliable narration point to  the necessity of a new, broader narratological concept, one which could then be described as perturbatory narration.</p>
url https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/190
work_keys_str_mv AT sabineschlickers lugetauschungundverwirrungunzuverlassigesundverstorendeserzahleninliteraturundfilm
_version_ 1725484308989214720