Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description
Abstract Intelligent analysis of a visual scene requires that important regions be prioritized and attentionally selected for preferential processing. What is the basis for this selection? Here we compared the influence of meaning and image salience on attentional guidance in real-world scenes durin...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5 |
id |
doaj-8fc3120e11324b53a417720964bf6a06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8fc3120e11324b53a417720964bf6a062020-12-08T05:30:36ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-09-01811910.1038/s41598-018-31894-5Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene DescriptionJohn M. Henderson0Taylor R. Hayes1Gwendolyn Rehrig2Fernanda Ferreira3Center for Mind and Brain, University of CaliforniaCenter for Mind and Brain, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Psychology, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Psychology, University of CaliforniaAbstract Intelligent analysis of a visual scene requires that important regions be prioritized and attentionally selected for preferential processing. What is the basis for this selection? Here we compared the influence of meaning and image salience on attentional guidance in real-world scenes during two free-viewing scene description tasks. Meaning was represented by meaning maps capturing the spatial distribution of semantic features. Image salience was represented by saliency maps capturing the spatial distribution of image features. Both types of maps were coded in a format that could be directly compared to maps of the spatial distribution of attention derived from viewers’ eye fixations in the scene description tasks. The results showed that both meaning and salience predicted the spatial distribution of attention in these tasks, but that when the correlation between meaning and salience was statistically controlled, only meaning accounted for unique variance in attention. The results support theories in which cognitive relevance plays the dominant functional role in controlling human attentional guidance in scenes. The results also have practical implications for current artificial intelligence approaches to labeling real-world images.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John M. Henderson Taylor R. Hayes Gwendolyn Rehrig Fernanda Ferreira |
spellingShingle |
John M. Henderson Taylor R. Hayes Gwendolyn Rehrig Fernanda Ferreira Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
John M. Henderson Taylor R. Hayes Gwendolyn Rehrig Fernanda Ferreira |
author_sort |
John M. Henderson |
title |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description |
title_short |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description |
title_full |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description |
title_fullStr |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description |
title_sort |
meaning guides attention during real-world scene description |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Intelligent analysis of a visual scene requires that important regions be prioritized and attentionally selected for preferential processing. What is the basis for this selection? Here we compared the influence of meaning and image salience on attentional guidance in real-world scenes during two free-viewing scene description tasks. Meaning was represented by meaning maps capturing the spatial distribution of semantic features. Image salience was represented by saliency maps capturing the spatial distribution of image features. Both types of maps were coded in a format that could be directly compared to maps of the spatial distribution of attention derived from viewers’ eye fixations in the scene description tasks. The results showed that both meaning and salience predicted the spatial distribution of attention in these tasks, but that when the correlation between meaning and salience was statistically controlled, only meaning accounted for unique variance in attention. The results support theories in which cognitive relevance plays the dominant functional role in controlling human attentional guidance in scenes. The results also have practical implications for current artificial intelligence approaches to labeling real-world images. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnmhenderson meaningguidesattentionduringrealworldscenedescription AT taylorrhayes meaningguidesattentionduringrealworldscenedescription AT gwendolynrehrig meaningguidesattentionduringrealworldscenedescription AT fernandaferreira meaningguidesattentionduringrealworldscenedescription |
_version_ |
1724391665178771456 |