Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models

Abstract There is a substantial gap between the current emissions of greenhouse gases and levels required for achieving the 2°C and 1.5°C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement. Understanding the implications of a temperature overshoot is thus an increasingly relevant research topic. Here we exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Melnikova, O. Boucher, P. Cadule, P. Ciais, T. Gasser, Y. Quilcaille, H. Shiogama, K. Tachiiri, T. Yokohata, K. Tanaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021-05-01
Series:Earth's Future
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001967
id doaj-8fe9ed0d8a874230b8949a6e393c7a02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8fe9ed0d8a874230b8949a6e393c7a022021-05-27T20:40:30ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772021-05-0195n/an/a10.1029/2020EF001967Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 ModelsI. Melnikova0O. Boucher1P. Cadule2P. Ciais3T. Gasser4Y. Quilcaille5H. Shiogama6K. Tachiiri7T. Yokohata8K. Tanaka9Institut Pierre‐Simon Laplace Sorbonne Université / CNRS Paris FranceInstitut Pierre‐Simon Laplace Sorbonne Université / CNRS Paris FranceInstitut Pierre‐Simon Laplace Sorbonne Université / CNRS Paris FranceLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE) Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA CNRS UVSQ) Gif‐sur‐Yvette FranceInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenberg AustriaInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenberg AustriaCenter for Global Environmental Research (CGER) National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba JapanCenter for Global Environmental Research (CGER) National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba JapanCenter for Global Environmental Research (CGER) National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba JapanCenter for Global Environmental Research (CGER) National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) Tsukuba JapanAbstract There is a substantial gap between the current emissions of greenhouse gases and levels required for achieving the 2°C and 1.5°C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement. Understanding the implications of a temperature overshoot is thus an increasingly relevant research topic. Here we explore the carbon cycle feedbacks over land and ocean in the SSP5‐3.4‐OS overshoot scenario by using an ensemble of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 Earth system models. Models show that after the CO2 concentration and air temperature peaks, land and ocean are decreasing carbon sinks from the 2,040s and become sources for a limited time in the 22nd century. The decrease in the carbon uptake precedes the CO2 concentration peak. The early peak of ocean uptake stems from its dependency on the atmospheric CO2 growth rate. The early peak of the land uptake occurs due to a larger increase in ecosystem respiration than the increase in gross primary production, as well as due to a concomitant increase in land‐use change emissions primarily attributed to the wide implementation of biofuel croplands. The carbon cycle feedback parameters amplify after the CO2 concentration and temperature peaks due to inertia of the Earth system so that land and ocean absorb more carbon per unit change in the atmospheric CO2 change (stronger negative feedback) and lose more carbon per unit temperature change (stronger positive feedback) compared to if the feedbacks stayed unchanged. The increased negative CO2 feedback outperforms the increased positive climate feedback. This feature should be investigated under other scenarios.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001967Carbon cyclecarbon‐climate feedbackcarbon‐concentration feedbackCMIP6SSP5‐3.4‐OSovershoot
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. Melnikova
O. Boucher
P. Cadule
P. Ciais
T. Gasser
Y. Quilcaille
H. Shiogama
K. Tachiiri
T. Yokohata
K. Tanaka
spellingShingle I. Melnikova
O. Boucher
P. Cadule
P. Ciais
T. Gasser
Y. Quilcaille
H. Shiogama
K. Tachiiri
T. Yokohata
K. Tanaka
Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
Earth's Future
Carbon cycle
carbon‐climate feedback
carbon‐concentration feedback
CMIP6
SSP5‐3.4‐OS
overshoot
author_facet I. Melnikova
O. Boucher
P. Cadule
P. Ciais
T. Gasser
Y. Quilcaille
H. Shiogama
K. Tachiiri
T. Yokohata
K. Tanaka
author_sort I. Melnikova
title Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
title_short Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
title_full Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
title_fullStr Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
title_sort carbon cycle response to temperature overshoot beyond 2°c: an analysis of cmip6 models
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth's Future
issn 2328-4277
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract There is a substantial gap between the current emissions of greenhouse gases and levels required for achieving the 2°C and 1.5°C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement. Understanding the implications of a temperature overshoot is thus an increasingly relevant research topic. Here we explore the carbon cycle feedbacks over land and ocean in the SSP5‐3.4‐OS overshoot scenario by using an ensemble of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 Earth system models. Models show that after the CO2 concentration and air temperature peaks, land and ocean are decreasing carbon sinks from the 2,040s and become sources for a limited time in the 22nd century. The decrease in the carbon uptake precedes the CO2 concentration peak. The early peak of ocean uptake stems from its dependency on the atmospheric CO2 growth rate. The early peak of the land uptake occurs due to a larger increase in ecosystem respiration than the increase in gross primary production, as well as due to a concomitant increase in land‐use change emissions primarily attributed to the wide implementation of biofuel croplands. The carbon cycle feedback parameters amplify after the CO2 concentration and temperature peaks due to inertia of the Earth system so that land and ocean absorb more carbon per unit change in the atmospheric CO2 change (stronger negative feedback) and lose more carbon per unit temperature change (stronger positive feedback) compared to if the feedbacks stayed unchanged. The increased negative CO2 feedback outperforms the increased positive climate feedback. This feature should be investigated under other scenarios.
topic Carbon cycle
carbon‐climate feedback
carbon‐concentration feedback
CMIP6
SSP5‐3.4‐OS
overshoot
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001967
work_keys_str_mv AT imelnikova carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT oboucher carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT pcadule carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT pciais carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT tgasser carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT yquilcaille carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT hshiogama carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT ktachiiri carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT tyokohata carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
AT ktanaka carboncycleresponsetotemperatureovershootbeyond2cananalysisofcmip6models
_version_ 1721425331340967936