Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error

Abstract This paper presents several methods for performing two types of static load model conversion: exponential to ZIP & ZIP to exponential model conversion. In general, these conversions are inaccurate due to non‐equivalence of exponential and ZIP (second‐order polynomial) models. A numerica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madis Leinakse, Jako Kilter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12002
id doaj-901e28943cb54f5b96e4ff555f643020
record_format Article
spelling doaj-901e28943cb54f5b96e4ff555f6430202021-07-14T13:20:09ZengWileyIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution1751-86871751-86952021-01-0115217719310.1049/gtd2.12002Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and errorMadis Leinakse0Jako Kilter1Department of Electrical Power Engineering and Mechatronics Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn EstoniaDepartment of Electrical Power Engineering and Mechatronics Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn EstoniaAbstract This paper presents several methods for performing two types of static load model conversion: exponential to ZIP & ZIP to exponential model conversion. In general, these conversions are inaccurate due to non‐equivalence of exponential and ZIP (second‐order polynomial) models. A numerical analysis is conducted using generated datasets of load models to analyse the error and to compare the accuracy of the presented methods. The results of the analysis indicate that the optimal selection of conversion method depends on a number of factors, including normalisation of load models, ZIP model type (accurate or constrained) and expected use of the converted model. In addition, a case study is conducted to analyse the impact of conversion error on load flow results. The results of the case study indicate that a significant difference in load flow results can occur when the load models are converted. Recommendations for conversion method selection are given in the discussion section of the paper.https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madis Leinakse
Jako Kilter
spellingShingle Madis Leinakse
Jako Kilter
Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
author_facet Madis Leinakse
Jako Kilter
author_sort Madis Leinakse
title Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
title_short Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
title_full Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
title_fullStr Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
title_full_unstemmed Exponential to ZIP and ZIP to exponential load model conversion: Methods and error
title_sort exponential to zip and zip to exponential load model conversion: methods and error
publisher Wiley
series IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
issn 1751-8687
1751-8695
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract This paper presents several methods for performing two types of static load model conversion: exponential to ZIP & ZIP to exponential model conversion. In general, these conversions are inaccurate due to non‐equivalence of exponential and ZIP (second‐order polynomial) models. A numerical analysis is conducted using generated datasets of load models to analyse the error and to compare the accuracy of the presented methods. The results of the analysis indicate that the optimal selection of conversion method depends on a number of factors, including normalisation of load models, ZIP model type (accurate or constrained) and expected use of the converted model. In addition, a case study is conducted to analyse the impact of conversion error on load flow results. The results of the case study indicate that a significant difference in load flow results can occur when the load models are converted. Recommendations for conversion method selection are given in the discussion section of the paper.
url https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12002
work_keys_str_mv AT madisleinakse exponentialtozipandziptoexponentialloadmodelconversionmethodsanderror
AT jakokilter exponentialtozipandziptoexponentialloadmodelconversionmethodsanderror
_version_ 1721302945652277248