Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion

This research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Céline Beaudet, Denis Alamargot
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université Laval 2011-10-01
Series:Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330
id doaj-905716dbd3694055abb5b256204e761a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-905716dbd3694055abb5b256204e761a2021-09-20T06:36:24ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442011-10-0129110.4000/communication.2330Argumenter pour ou contre son opinionCéline BeaudetDenis AlamargotThis research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her identification and emotions. Educational guidelines, designed to help students temper their own opinions, are proposed in conclusion.http://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330argumentationprofessional trainingrhetoricteaching of writingwriting
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
spellingShingle Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
Communication
argumentation
professional training
rhetoric
teaching of writing
writing
author_facet Céline Beaudet
Denis Alamargot
author_sort Céline Beaudet
title Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_short Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_full Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_fullStr Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_full_unstemmed Argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
title_sort argumenter pour ou contre son opinion
publisher Université Laval
series Communication
issn 1189-3788
1920-7344
publishDate 2011-10-01
description This research assesses how well students in professional communication succeed in writing an argumentative essay without introducing their personal beliefs. Content analysis shows that the emphasis is put on ethos and pathos rather than on logos, so as to influence the reader by appealing to his/her identification and emotions. Educational guidelines, designed to help students temper their own opinions, are proposed in conclusion.
topic argumentation
professional training
rhetoric
teaching of writing
writing
url http://journals.openedition.org/communication/2330
work_keys_str_mv AT celinebeaudet argumenterpouroucontresonopinion
AT denisalamargot argumenterpouroucontresonopinion
_version_ 1717374796676726784