Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering

A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott Stratton, Namdev B. Shelke, Kazunori Hoshino, Swetha Rudraiah, Sangamesh G. Kumbar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2016-12-01
Series:Bioactive Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X16300238
id doaj-905e01b0207d4036a0f89c4f368f23f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-905e01b0207d4036a0f89c4f368f23f12021-03-02T11:11:50ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Bioactive Materials2452-199X2016-12-01129310810.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineeringScott Stratton0Namdev B. Shelke1Kazunori Hoshino2Swetha Rudraiah3Sangamesh G. Kumbar4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USADepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Saint Joseph, Hartford, CT, 06103, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USAA variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue regeneration. Scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching, particle sintering, hydrogels and lithography have been successful in promoting cell growth in vitro and tissue regeneration in vivo. Scaffold systems derived from decellularization of whole organs or tissues has been popular due to their assured biocompatibility and bioactivity. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often failed to create intricate structures with greater resolution, not reproducible and involved multiple steps. The 3D printing technology overcome several limitations of the traditional techniques and made it easier to adopt several thermoplastics and hydrogels to create micro-nanostructured scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering and drug delivery. This review highlights scaffold fabrication methodologies with a focus on optimizing scaffold performance through the matrix pores, bioactivity and degradation rate to enable tissue regeneration. Review highlights few examples of bioactive scaffold mediated nerve, muscle, tendon/ligament and bone regeneration. Regardless of the efforts required for optimization, a shift in 3D scaffold uses from the laboratory into everyday life is expected in the near future as some of the methods discussed in this review become more streamlined.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X16300238BioactiveBiomaterialsScaffoldPorosityBiodegradableTissue regeneration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scott Stratton
Namdev B. Shelke
Kazunori Hoshino
Swetha Rudraiah
Sangamesh G. Kumbar
spellingShingle Scott Stratton
Namdev B. Shelke
Kazunori Hoshino
Swetha Rudraiah
Sangamesh G. Kumbar
Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
Bioactive Materials
Bioactive
Biomaterials
Scaffold
Porosity
Biodegradable
Tissue regeneration
author_facet Scott Stratton
Namdev B. Shelke
Kazunori Hoshino
Swetha Rudraiah
Sangamesh G. Kumbar
author_sort Scott Stratton
title Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_short Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_fullStr Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full_unstemmed Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_sort bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
series Bioactive Materials
issn 2452-199X
publishDate 2016-12-01
description A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue regeneration. Scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching, particle sintering, hydrogels and lithography have been successful in promoting cell growth in vitro and tissue regeneration in vivo. Scaffold systems derived from decellularization of whole organs or tissues has been popular due to their assured biocompatibility and bioactivity. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often failed to create intricate structures with greater resolution, not reproducible and involved multiple steps. The 3D printing technology overcome several limitations of the traditional techniques and made it easier to adopt several thermoplastics and hydrogels to create micro-nanostructured scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering and drug delivery. This review highlights scaffold fabrication methodologies with a focus on optimizing scaffold performance through the matrix pores, bioactivity and degradation rate to enable tissue regeneration. Review highlights few examples of bioactive scaffold mediated nerve, muscle, tendon/ligament and bone regeneration. Regardless of the efforts required for optimization, a shift in 3D scaffold uses from the laboratory into everyday life is expected in the near future as some of the methods discussed in this review become more streamlined.
topic Bioactive
Biomaterials
Scaffold
Porosity
Biodegradable
Tissue regeneration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X16300238
work_keys_str_mv AT scottstratton bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT namdevbshelke bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT kazunorihoshino bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT swetharudraiah bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT sangameshgkumbar bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
_version_ 1724235124549091328