| Summary: | Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical mitomycin‑C (MMC) drops with that of subconjunctival 5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU) injections for management of early bleb failure after trabeculectomy or combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (PT+PCIOL). Methods: In a randomized comparative study, 37 eyes of 37 patients with impending early bleb failure received MMC 0.02% eye drops for 2 or 4 weeks (19 eyes) or subconjunctival 5‑FU injections, 5 mg per dose (18 eyes). Complete success was defined as 5 < IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medications. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. However, there were more cases of combined PT+PCIOL in the MMC group [11 (57.9%) eyes versus 3 (16.7%) eyes, P = 0.017]. Mean preoperative IOP was 20.58.85 mmHg in the MMC group and 25.8211.35 mmHg in the 5‑FU group (P = 0.129), which was decreased to 13.26.1 and 10.64.8 mmHg respectively after 12 months (P = 0.159). There was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of bleb extent (P = 0.170), height (P = 0.178) or vascularity (P = 0.366). At the end of the study, complete success was achieved in 13 eyes (68.4%) in the MMC group and 14 eyes (77.8%) in the 5‑FU group (P = 0.714). The survival of success at 8 months (median follow-up) was 89.5% and 86.5% in the MMC and 5‑FU groups respectively; the number of glaucoma medications (P = 0.707) and best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.550) were also comparable. Complication rates were similar in the study groups (P = 0.140). Conclusion: Topical MMC 0.02% has comparable safety and efficacy to subconjunctival 5‑FU injections for management of early bleb failure. Topical MMC 0.02% drops are more convenient and can be initiated first, while 5‑FU injections may be reserved for eyes with an insufficient response to topical MMC.
|
|---|
