Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions

Abstract Background Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eline van den Broek-Altenburg, Adam Atherly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Health Economics Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x
id doaj-90927766fa474cf58fab041905d24870
record_format Article
spelling doaj-90927766fa474cf58fab041905d248702020-11-25T03:44:43ZengBMCHealth Economics Review2191-19912020-06-011011810.1186/s13561-020-00276-xUsing discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisionsEline van den Broek-Altenburg0Adam Atherly1The Larner College of Medicine, University of VermontThe Larner College of Medicine, University of VermontAbstract Background Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a lack of critical data elements. The objective of this review is to outline the advantages of using stated preferences (SP) data in health services research, and to outline how these methods can be used to evaluate choices that have not yet been offered or studied. Main body This article focuses on the application of DCE’s to relevant policy and health system delivery questions currently relevant, particularly in the United States. DCE’s may be helpful to collect data from patient or consumer data that we currently do not have. The article provides examples of research questions that have been answered using SP data collected with a DCE. It outlines how to construct a DCE and how to analyze the data. It also discusses the methodological challenges and emphasizes important considerations regarding the design and estimation methods. SP data can be adopted in situations where we would like to have consumer choice data, but we currently do not. These are often hypothetical situations to analyze the decision-making process of individuals. With SP data it is possible to analyze trade-offs patients make when choosing between treatment options where these hard to measure attributes are important. Conclusion This paper emphasizes that a carefully designed DCE and appropriate estimation methods can open up a new world of data regarding trade-offs patients and providers in healthcare are willing to make. It updates previous “how to” guide for DCE’s for health services researchers and health economists who are not familiar with these methods or have been unwilling to use them and updates previous description of these methods with timely examples.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-xStated preferencesChoice modellingUnobserved characteristicsChoice attributesDiscrete choice experiment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eline van den Broek-Altenburg
Adam Atherly
spellingShingle Eline van den Broek-Altenburg
Adam Atherly
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
Health Economics Review
Stated preferences
Choice modelling
Unobserved characteristics
Choice attributes
Discrete choice experiment
author_facet Eline van den Broek-Altenburg
Adam Atherly
author_sort Eline van den Broek-Altenburg
title Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_short Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_full Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_fullStr Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_full_unstemmed Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_sort using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
publisher BMC
series Health Economics Review
issn 2191-1991
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a lack of critical data elements. The objective of this review is to outline the advantages of using stated preferences (SP) data in health services research, and to outline how these methods can be used to evaluate choices that have not yet been offered or studied. Main body This article focuses on the application of DCE’s to relevant policy and health system delivery questions currently relevant, particularly in the United States. DCE’s may be helpful to collect data from patient or consumer data that we currently do not have. The article provides examples of research questions that have been answered using SP data collected with a DCE. It outlines how to construct a DCE and how to analyze the data. It also discusses the methodological challenges and emphasizes important considerations regarding the design and estimation methods. SP data can be adopted in situations where we would like to have consumer choice data, but we currently do not. These are often hypothetical situations to analyze the decision-making process of individuals. With SP data it is possible to analyze trade-offs patients make when choosing between treatment options where these hard to measure attributes are important. Conclusion This paper emphasizes that a carefully designed DCE and appropriate estimation methods can open up a new world of data regarding trade-offs patients and providers in healthcare are willing to make. It updates previous “how to” guide for DCE’s for health services researchers and health economists who are not familiar with these methods or have been unwilling to use them and updates previous description of these methods with timely examples.
topic Stated preferences
Choice modelling
Unobserved characteristics
Choice attributes
Discrete choice experiment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x
work_keys_str_mv AT elinevandenbroekaltenburg usingdiscretechoiceexperimentstomeasurepreferencesforhardtoobservechoiceattributestoinformhealthpolicydecisions
AT adamatherly usingdiscretechoiceexperimentstomeasurepreferencesforhardtoobservechoiceattributestoinformhealthpolicydecisions
_version_ 1724513087751454720