Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients
Main Authors: | S. Pradhan, P.K. Sahoo, S. Mallick |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Indian Heart Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483215005398 |
Similar Items
-
Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
by: Xiuying Tang, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Administration of Eptifibatide During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
by: tooran makhdoumi
Published: (2020-10-01) -
COMPARISON OF INTRACORONARY VERAPAMIL VS ADENOSINE FOR RESTORATION OF CORONARY BLOOD FLOW POST PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) IN PATIENTS WITH NO-REFLOW
by: Mohsin Saif, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Antiplatelet medications in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: focus on tirofiban
by: T. A. Batyraliev, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01) -
Effect of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and tirofiban injection on myocardial injury in patients with no reflow in PCI
by: Xiang-Yang Xia
Published: (2018-04-01)