Radiation-induced bystander effect: The important part of ionizing radiation response. Potential clinical implications

• Main Authors: Maria Wideł, Waldemar Przybyszewski, Joanna Rzeszowska-Wolny
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Index Copernicus International S.A. 2009-08-01
• Series: Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej
• Subjects: radiation-induced bystander effect; ionizing radiation; intercellular signaling; genomic instability; Apoptosis; cytogenetic damage; in vitro and in vivo studies; potential clinical effect
• Online Access: http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=892869

It has long been a central radiobiological dogma that the damaging effects of ionizing radiation, such as cell death, cytogenetic changes, apoptosis, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis, are the results of the direct ionization of cell structures, particularly DNA, or indirect damage via water radiolysis products. However, several years ago attention turned to a third mechanism of radiation, termed the “bystander effect” or “radiation-induced bystander effect” (RIBE). This is induced by agents and signals emitted by directly irradiated cells and manifests as a lowering of survival, cytogenetic damage, apoptosis enhancement, and biochemical changes in neighboring non-irradiated cells. The bystander effect is mainly observed in in vitro experiments using very low doses of alpha particles (range; mGy, cGy), but also after conventional irradiation (X-rays, gamma rays) at low as well as conventional doses. The mechanisms responsible for the bystander effect are complex and still poorly understood. It is believed that molecular signals released from irradiated cells induce different signaling ways in non-irradiated neighboring cells, leading to the observed events. The molecular signals may be transmitted through gap junction intercellular communication and through a medium transfer mechanism. The nature of these transmitted factors are diverse, and still not defi nitely established. It seems that RIBE may have important clinical implications for health risk associated with radiation exposure. Potentially, this effectmay have important implications in the creation of whole-body or localized side effects in tissues beyond the irradiation fi eld and also in low-dose radiological and radioisotope diagnostics. Factors emitted by irradiated cells may result in the risk of genetic instability, mutations, and second primary cancer induction. They might also have their own part in inducing and extending post-radiation side effects in normal tissue. The bystander effect may be a potentially harmful or a useful event in radiotherapy. The elevation of damage to tumor cells not directly hit by radiation or the initiation of tumor cell differentiation may increase the therapeutic ratio. If, however, molecular species secreted by irradiated tumor cells in vivo damage neighboring normal cells (epithelial and endothelial cells, fi broblasts, or lymphocytes), the bystander effect would be harmful and could lead to increased side effects in normal tissue. This is especially important in modern radiotherapy, as 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are aimed at diminishing the radiation dose in normal tissues. Recent in vivo studies on animals indicate that bystander effects may appear in organs and tissues remote from the irradiated fi eld and the extension of tissue damage seems to be tissue-type dependent. However, recent experimental results indicate that non-irradiated cells that are neighbors of irradiated cells may diminish radiation damage in the radiation-focused cells. Less is known about the bystander effect during fractionated irradiation. Thus the clinical implications of the bystander effect and its possible modifi cation for radiotherapeutic usefulness is still under debate.