Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery

Hyperspectral remote sensing imagery contains much more information in the spectral domain than does multispectral imagery. The consecutive and abundant spectral signals provide a great potential for classification and anomaly detection. In this study, two real hyperspectral data sets were used for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiandong Guo, Ruiliang Pu, Jun Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/6/4/56
id doaj-9106aa88a8934ef4a83351075fa8635c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9106aa88a8934ef4a83351075fa8635c2020-11-24T21:05:39ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632016-12-01645610.3390/geosciences6040056geosciences6040056Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing ImageryQiandong Guo0Ruiliang Pu1Jun Cheng2School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USASchool of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USASchool of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USAHyperspectral remote sensing imagery contains much more information in the spectral domain than does multispectral imagery. The consecutive and abundant spectral signals provide a great potential for classification and anomaly detection. In this study, two real hyperspectral data sets were used for anomaly detection. One data set was an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) data covering the post-attack World Trade Center (WTC) and anomalies are fire spots. The other data set called SpecTIR contained fabric panels as anomalies compared to their background. Existing anomaly detection algorithms including the Reed–Xiaoli detector (RXD), the blocked adaptive computation efficient outlier nominator (BACON), the random selection based anomaly detector (RSAD), the weighted-RXD (W-RXD), and the probabilistic anomaly detector (PAD) are reviewed here. The RXD generally sets strict assumptions to the background, which cannot be met in many scenarios, while BACON, RSAD, and W-RXD employ strategies to optimize the estimation of background information. The PAD firstly estimates both background information and anomaly information and then uses the information to conduct anomaly detection. Here, the BACON, RSAD, W-RXD, and PAD outperformed the RXD in terms of detection accuracy, and W-RXD and PAD required less time than BACON and RSAD.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/6/4/56hyperspectral imageryanomaly detectionfire mapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiandong Guo
Ruiliang Pu
Jun Cheng
spellingShingle Qiandong Guo
Ruiliang Pu
Jun Cheng
Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
Geosciences
hyperspectral imagery
anomaly detection
fire mapping
author_facet Qiandong Guo
Ruiliang Pu
Jun Cheng
author_sort Qiandong Guo
title Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
title_short Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
title_full Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
title_fullStr Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
title_full_unstemmed Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery
title_sort anomaly detection from hyperspectral remote sensing imagery
publisher MDPI AG
series Geosciences
issn 2076-3263
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Hyperspectral remote sensing imagery contains much more information in the spectral domain than does multispectral imagery. The consecutive and abundant spectral signals provide a great potential for classification and anomaly detection. In this study, two real hyperspectral data sets were used for anomaly detection. One data set was an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) data covering the post-attack World Trade Center (WTC) and anomalies are fire spots. The other data set called SpecTIR contained fabric panels as anomalies compared to their background. Existing anomaly detection algorithms including the Reed–Xiaoli detector (RXD), the blocked adaptive computation efficient outlier nominator (BACON), the random selection based anomaly detector (RSAD), the weighted-RXD (W-RXD), and the probabilistic anomaly detector (PAD) are reviewed here. The RXD generally sets strict assumptions to the background, which cannot be met in many scenarios, while BACON, RSAD, and W-RXD employ strategies to optimize the estimation of background information. The PAD firstly estimates both background information and anomaly information and then uses the information to conduct anomaly detection. Here, the BACON, RSAD, W-RXD, and PAD outperformed the RXD in terms of detection accuracy, and W-RXD and PAD required less time than BACON and RSAD.
topic hyperspectral imagery
anomaly detection
fire mapping
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/6/4/56
work_keys_str_mv AT qiandongguo anomalydetectionfromhyperspectralremotesensingimagery
AT ruiliangpu anomalydetectionfromhyperspectralremotesensingimagery
AT juncheng anomalydetectionfromhyperspectralremotesensingimagery
_version_ 1716768063909527552