Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets

Driven by the motive of minimizing the transportation costs of raw materials to manufacture wood–plastic composites (WPCs), Part I and the current Part II of this paper series explore the utilization of an alternative wood feedstock, i.e., pellets. Part I of this study reported on the characteristic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geeta Pokhrel, Douglas J. Gardner, Yousoo Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/16/2769
id doaj-910c02a3df464e6b9eb93b0864030052
record_format Article
spelling doaj-910c02a3df464e6b9eb93b08640300522021-08-26T14:15:30ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602021-08-01132769276910.3390/polym13162769Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood PelletsGeeta Pokhrel0Douglas J. Gardner1Yousoo Han2School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USASchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USASchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USADriven by the motive of minimizing the transportation costs of raw materials to manufacture wood–plastic composites (WPCs), Part I and the current Part II of this paper series explore the utilization of an alternative wood feedstock, i.e., pellets. Part I of this study reported on the characteristics of wood flour and wood pellets manufactured from secondary processing mill residues. Part II reports on the physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)-based WPCs made using the two different wood feedstocks, i.e., wood flour and wood pellets. WPCs were made from 40-mesh wood flour and wood pellets from four different wood species (white cedar, white pine, spruce-fir and red maple) in the presence and absence of the coupling agent maleic anhydride polypropylene (MAPP). With MAPP, the weight percentage of wood filler was 20%, PP 78%, MAPP 2% and without MAPP, formulation by weight percentage of wood filler was 20% and PP 80%. Fluorescent images showed wood particles’ distribution in the PP polymer matrix was similar for both wood flour and ground wood pellets. Dispersion of particles was higher with ground wood pellets in the PP matrix. On average, the density of composite products from wood pellets was higher, tensile strength, tensile modulus and impact strength were lower than the composites made from wood flour. Flexural properties of the control composites made with pellets were higher and with MAPP were lower than the composites made from wood flour. However, the overall mechanical property differences were low (0.5–10%) depending on the particular WPC formulations. Statistical analysis also showed there was no significant differences in the material property values of the composites made from wood flour and wood pellets. In some situations, WPC properties were better using wood pellets rather than using wood flour. We expect if the material properties of WPCs from wood flour versus wood pellets are similar and with a greater reduction in transportation costs for wood pellet feedstocks, this would be beneficial to WPC manufacturers and consumers.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/16/2769wood flourwood pelletswood–plastic compositestransportation costsphysical propertiesmechanical properties
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Geeta Pokhrel
Douglas J. Gardner
Yousoo Han
spellingShingle Geeta Pokhrel
Douglas J. Gardner
Yousoo Han
Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
Polymers
wood flour
wood pellets
wood–plastic composites
transportation costs
physical properties
mechanical properties
author_facet Geeta Pokhrel
Douglas J. Gardner
Yousoo Han
author_sort Geeta Pokhrel
title Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
title_short Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
title_full Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
title_fullStr Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
title_full_unstemmed Properties of Wood–Plastic Composites Manufactured from Two Different Wood Feedstocks: Wood Flour and Wood Pellets
title_sort properties of wood–plastic composites manufactured from two different wood feedstocks: wood flour and wood pellets
publisher MDPI AG
series Polymers
issn 2073-4360
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Driven by the motive of minimizing the transportation costs of raw materials to manufacture wood–plastic composites (WPCs), Part I and the current Part II of this paper series explore the utilization of an alternative wood feedstock, i.e., pellets. Part I of this study reported on the characteristics of wood flour and wood pellets manufactured from secondary processing mill residues. Part II reports on the physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)-based WPCs made using the two different wood feedstocks, i.e., wood flour and wood pellets. WPCs were made from 40-mesh wood flour and wood pellets from four different wood species (white cedar, white pine, spruce-fir and red maple) in the presence and absence of the coupling agent maleic anhydride polypropylene (MAPP). With MAPP, the weight percentage of wood filler was 20%, PP 78%, MAPP 2% and without MAPP, formulation by weight percentage of wood filler was 20% and PP 80%. Fluorescent images showed wood particles’ distribution in the PP polymer matrix was similar for both wood flour and ground wood pellets. Dispersion of particles was higher with ground wood pellets in the PP matrix. On average, the density of composite products from wood pellets was higher, tensile strength, tensile modulus and impact strength were lower than the composites made from wood flour. Flexural properties of the control composites made with pellets were higher and with MAPP were lower than the composites made from wood flour. However, the overall mechanical property differences were low (0.5–10%) depending on the particular WPC formulations. Statistical analysis also showed there was no significant differences in the material property values of the composites made from wood flour and wood pellets. In some situations, WPC properties were better using wood pellets rather than using wood flour. We expect if the material properties of WPCs from wood flour versus wood pellets are similar and with a greater reduction in transportation costs for wood pellet feedstocks, this would be beneficial to WPC manufacturers and consumers.
topic wood flour
wood pellets
wood–plastic composites
transportation costs
physical properties
mechanical properties
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/16/2769
work_keys_str_mv AT geetapokhrel propertiesofwoodplasticcompositesmanufacturedfromtwodifferentwoodfeedstockswoodflourandwoodpellets
AT douglasjgardner propertiesofwoodplasticcompositesmanufacturedfromtwodifferentwoodfeedstockswoodflourandwoodpellets
AT yousoohan propertiesofwoodplasticcompositesmanufacturedfromtwodifferentwoodfeedstockswoodflourandwoodpellets
_version_ 1721190524649472000