Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
Classical probability theory (CPT) has represented the rational standard for decision making in human cognition. Even though CPT has provided many descriptively excellent decision models, there have also been some empirical results persistently problematic for CPT accounts. The tension between the n...
Main Authors: | Bartosz W. Wojciechowski, Emmanuel M. Pothos |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00391/full |
Similar Items
-
Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
by: Bartosz W. Wojciechowski, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Formalizing heuristics in decision making: a quantum probability perspective
by: Emmanuel ePothos, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01) -
In search for a standard of rationality
by: Emmanuel ePothos, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Quantum Probability Theory as a Common Framework for Reasoning and Similarity
by: Jennifer S Trueblood, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01) -
What Is Rational and Irrational in Human Decision Making
by: Emmanuel M. Pothos, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)