Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Research on the ecological consequences of global climate change has elicited a growing interest in the use of time series analysis to investigate population dynamics in a changing climate. Here, we compare linear and non-linear mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Post Eric, Ellis Alicia M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-03-01
Series:BMC Ecology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/2
id doaj-91961dec75464c9bbb02a708f5286a05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-91961dec75464c9bbb02a708f5286a052021-09-02T16:18:31ZengBMCBMC Ecology1472-67852004-03-0141210.1186/1472-6785-4-2Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approachesPost EricEllis Alicia M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Research on the ecological consequences of global climate change has elicited a growing interest in the use of time series analysis to investigate population dynamics in a changing climate. Here, we compare linear and non-linear models describing the contribution of climate to the density fluctuations of the population of wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan from 1959 to 1999.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The non-linear self excitatory threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model revealed that, due to differences in the strength and nature of density dependence, relatively small and large populations may be differentially affected by future changes in climate. Both linear and non-linear models predict a decrease in the population of wolves with predicted changes in climate.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Because specific predictions differed between linear and non-linear models, our study highlights the importance of using non-linear methods that allow the detection of non-linearity in the strength and nature of density dependence. Failure to adopt a non-linear approach to modelling population response to climate change, either exclusively or in addition to linear approaches, may compromise efforts to quantify ecological consequences of future warming.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Post Eric
Ellis Alicia M
spellingShingle Post Eric
Ellis Alicia M
Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
BMC Ecology
author_facet Post Eric
Ellis Alicia M
author_sort Post Eric
title Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
title_short Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
title_full Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
title_fullStr Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
title_full_unstemmed Population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
title_sort population response to climate change: linear vs. non-linear modeling approaches
publisher BMC
series BMC Ecology
issn 1472-6785
publishDate 2004-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Research on the ecological consequences of global climate change has elicited a growing interest in the use of time series analysis to investigate population dynamics in a changing climate. Here, we compare linear and non-linear models describing the contribution of climate to the density fluctuations of the population of wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan from 1959 to 1999.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The non-linear self excitatory threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model revealed that, due to differences in the strength and nature of density dependence, relatively small and large populations may be differentially affected by future changes in climate. Both linear and non-linear models predict a decrease in the population of wolves with predicted changes in climate.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Because specific predictions differed between linear and non-linear models, our study highlights the importance of using non-linear methods that allow the detection of non-linearity in the strength and nature of density dependence. Failure to adopt a non-linear approach to modelling population response to climate change, either exclusively or in addition to linear approaches, may compromise efforts to quantify ecological consequences of future warming.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/2
work_keys_str_mv AT posteric populationresponsetoclimatechangelinearvsnonlinearmodelingapproaches
AT ellisaliciam populationresponsetoclimatechangelinearvsnonlinearmodelingapproaches
_version_ 1721172889843007488