Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Hager, Homan Taufik, Friederike Blum, Andrea Stockero, Martin Wiesmann, Arno Reich, Rebecca May, Omid Nikoubashman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251889
id doaj-91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb36468
record_format Article
spelling doaj-91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb364682021-05-30T04:30:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025188910.1371/journal.pone.0251889Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.Charlotte HagerHoman TaufikFriederike BlumAndrea StockeroMartin WiesmannArno ReichRebecca MayOmid Nikoubashman<h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We analyzed the effects of this feedback on work satisfaction, work meaningfulness and valuation of the therapy among our staff.<h4>Methods</h4>Our staff completed two self-reported questionnaires before and after the period of six months with systematic feedback.<h4>Results</h4>Employees with higher work meaningfulness and higher work satisfaction valuated endovascular stroke therapy as more useful (p<0.001). A good clinical outcome was regarded more motivating than a good interventional outcome (p<0.001). Receiving systematic feedback did not increase work satisfaction (p = 0.318) or work meaningfulness (p = 0.178). Radiographers valuated the usefulness of interventional therapy the worst of all employees (p≤ 0.017). After the feedback period, 75% of radiographers estimated stroke as a more severe disease than before. Also, their desire for feedback decreased significantly (p = 0.007). Primarily patient cases with unfavorable outcomes were remembered by the staff.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Systematic email feedback does not per se enhance work satisfaction or work meaningfulness among employees. However, receiving feedback is educative for the staff. Evaluating work satisfaction and the perception of treatment may help to identify unexpected issues and may therefore help to find specific measures that increase work satisfaction and motivation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251889
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charlotte Hager
Homan Taufik
Friederike Blum
Andrea Stockero
Martin Wiesmann
Arno Reich
Rebecca May
Omid Nikoubashman
spellingShingle Charlotte Hager
Homan Taufik
Friederike Blum
Andrea Stockero
Martin Wiesmann
Arno Reich
Rebecca May
Omid Nikoubashman
Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Charlotte Hager
Homan Taufik
Friederike Blum
Andrea Stockero
Martin Wiesmann
Arno Reich
Rebecca May
Omid Nikoubashman
author_sort Charlotte Hager
title Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_short Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_full Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_fullStr Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_full_unstemmed Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_sort work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We analyzed the effects of this feedback on work satisfaction, work meaningfulness and valuation of the therapy among our staff.<h4>Methods</h4>Our staff completed two self-reported questionnaires before and after the period of six months with systematic feedback.<h4>Results</h4>Employees with higher work meaningfulness and higher work satisfaction valuated endovascular stroke therapy as more useful (p<0.001). A good clinical outcome was regarded more motivating than a good interventional outcome (p<0.001). Receiving systematic feedback did not increase work satisfaction (p = 0.318) or work meaningfulness (p = 0.178). Radiographers valuated the usefulness of interventional therapy the worst of all employees (p≤ 0.017). After the feedback period, 75% of radiographers estimated stroke as a more severe disease than before. Also, their desire for feedback decreased significantly (p = 0.007). Primarily patient cases with unfavorable outcomes were remembered by the staff.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Systematic email feedback does not per se enhance work satisfaction or work meaningfulness among employees. However, receiving feedback is educative for the staff. Evaluating work satisfaction and the perception of treatment may help to identify unexpected issues and may therefore help to find specific measures that increase work satisfaction and motivation.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251889
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottehager worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT homantaufik worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT friederikeblum worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT andreastockero worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT martinwiesmann worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT arnoreich worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT rebeccamay worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
AT omidnikoubashman worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
_version_ 1721421221597282304