Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study

Abstract Aims/Introduction To investigate the efficacy/safety of dulaglutide once‐weekly monotherapy versus glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of a Chinese randomized, double‐blind, non‐inferiority, phase III study. Patients (n = ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Xin Shi, Xiao Min Liu, Yong Quan Shi, Quan Min Li, Jian Hua Ma, Yan Bing Li, Li Ying Du, Feng Wang, Lu Lu Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13075
id doaj-91fe1aaf9d094f2f969135e10d2d30f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-91fe1aaf9d094f2f969135e10d2d30f72021-05-02T08:31:40ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Investigation2040-11162040-11242020-01-0111114215010.1111/jdi.13075Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III studyLi Xin Shi0Xiao Min Liu1Yong Quan Shi2Quan Min Li3Jian Hua Ma4Yan Bing Li5Li Ying Du6Feng Wang7Lu Lu Chen8Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University GuiyangChinaDepartment of Endocrinology First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University HarbinChinaShanghai Changzheng Hospital ShanghaiChinaBeijing 262 Hospital BeijingChinaNanjing First Hospital NanjingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital Sun‐Yat Sen University GuangzhouChinaLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. ShanghaiChinaLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. ShanghaiChinaDepartment of Endocrinology Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan ChinaAbstract Aims/Introduction To investigate the efficacy/safety of dulaglutide once‐weekly monotherapy versus glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of a Chinese randomized, double‐blind, non‐inferiority, phase III study. Patients (n = 572) with inadequate glycemic control received dulaglutide 1.5 mg (n = 189) or 0.75 mg (n = 194) once‐weekly or glimepiride (1–3 mg/day; n = 189) for 26 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the non‐inferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus glimepiride by the change from baseline to week 26 in glycated hemoglobin (non‐inferiority margin 0.4%). Results Dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg were non‐inferior (P < 0.001) and superior (P ≤ 0.002) versus glimepiride for the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 26. The least‐squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) versus glimepiride were dulaglutide 1.5 mg, −0.53% (−0.74, −0.32) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg, −0.32% (−0.53, −0.12). Significantly more patients attained glycated hemoglobin <7.0% at week 26 in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg (71.7%) versus the glimepiride (57.5%; P = 0.005) group. The decrease from baseline to week 26 in fasting blood glucose was significantly more pronounced in both the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group (P < 0.01). The overall incidence and rate of hypoglycemia were lower in both of the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group. At week 26, bodyweight had increased from baseline in the glimepiride group and decreased from baseline in both dulaglutide groups. The most frequent gastrointestinal drug‐related adverse events with dulaglutide were diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting. Conclusions These findings support once‐weekly dulaglutide monotherapy as a treatment for Chinese patients with early stage type 2 diabetes.https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13075ChineseDulaglutideType 2 diabetes mellitus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li Xin Shi
Xiao Min Liu
Yong Quan Shi
Quan Min Li
Jian Hua Ma
Yan Bing Li
Li Ying Du
Feng Wang
Lu Lu Chen
spellingShingle Li Xin Shi
Xiao Min Liu
Yong Quan Shi
Quan Min Li
Jian Hua Ma
Yan Bing Li
Li Ying Du
Feng Wang
Lu Lu Chen
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Chinese
Dulaglutide
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
author_facet Li Xin Shi
Xiao Min Liu
Yong Quan Shi
Quan Min Li
Jian Hua Ma
Yan Bing Li
Li Ying Du
Feng Wang
Lu Lu Chen
author_sort Li Xin Shi
title Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
title_short Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
title_full Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III study
title_sort efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: post‐hoc analyses of a randomized, double‐blind, phase iii study
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Diabetes Investigation
issn 2040-1116
2040-1124
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Aims/Introduction To investigate the efficacy/safety of dulaglutide once‐weekly monotherapy versus glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of a Chinese randomized, double‐blind, non‐inferiority, phase III study. Patients (n = 572) with inadequate glycemic control received dulaglutide 1.5 mg (n = 189) or 0.75 mg (n = 194) once‐weekly or glimepiride (1–3 mg/day; n = 189) for 26 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the non‐inferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus glimepiride by the change from baseline to week 26 in glycated hemoglobin (non‐inferiority margin 0.4%). Results Dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg were non‐inferior (P < 0.001) and superior (P ≤ 0.002) versus glimepiride for the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 26. The least‐squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) versus glimepiride were dulaglutide 1.5 mg, −0.53% (−0.74, −0.32) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg, −0.32% (−0.53, −0.12). Significantly more patients attained glycated hemoglobin <7.0% at week 26 in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg (71.7%) versus the glimepiride (57.5%; P = 0.005) group. The decrease from baseline to week 26 in fasting blood glucose was significantly more pronounced in both the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group (P < 0.01). The overall incidence and rate of hypoglycemia were lower in both of the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group. At week 26, bodyweight had increased from baseline in the glimepiride group and decreased from baseline in both dulaglutide groups. The most frequent gastrointestinal drug‐related adverse events with dulaglutide were diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting. Conclusions These findings support once‐weekly dulaglutide monotherapy as a treatment for Chinese patients with early stage type 2 diabetes.
topic Chinese
Dulaglutide
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13075
work_keys_str_mv AT lixinshi efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT xiaominliu efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT yongquanshi efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT quanminli efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT jianhuama efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT yanbingli efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT liyingdu efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT fengwang efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
AT luluchen efficacyandsafetyofdulaglutidemonotherapycomparedwithglimepirideinchinesepatientswithtype2diabetesposthocanalysesofarandomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudy
_version_ 1721493755950792704