Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5

Abstract In this study we derive the environmental lapse rate (ELR) from vertical profiles of temperature in the lower troposphere, applying it to downscale air temperature of the new European Centre For Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis ERA5, which replaces ERA‐Interim (ERAI). We fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuel Dutra, Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater, Souhail Boussetta, Takuya Komori, Shoji Hirahara, Gianpaolo Balsamo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-05-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000984
id doaj-9201b0155fa5438aa56b06ee9566d8da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9201b0155fa5438aa56b06ee9566d8da2020-11-25T03:14:48ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842020-05-0175n/an/a10.1029/2019EA000984Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5Emanuel Dutra0Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater1Souhail Boussetta2Takuya Komori3Shoji Hirahara4Gianpaolo Balsamo5Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), Faculdade de Ciências Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon PortugalEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UKEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UKGlobal Environment and Marine Department Japan Meteorological Agency Tokyo JapanGlobal Environment and Marine Department Japan Meteorological Agency Tokyo JapanEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UKAbstract In this study we derive the environmental lapse rate (ELR) from vertical profiles of temperature in the lower troposphere, applying it to downscale air temperature of the new European Centre For Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis ERA5, which replaces ERA‐Interim (ERAI). We focus over the western U.S. region, a data‐rich area with observations of daily maximum and minimum temperature (Global Historical Climatology Network) and snow depth and soil temperature. Observations indicate an ELR of −4.5 K·km−1 in the region, lower than the commonly used −6.5 K·km−1. ERA5 ELR agrees with the observational estimates, with some overestimation in winter and limitations in the diurnal variability. The elevation correction of ERA5 temperature using different ELR showed the benefits of deriving ELR fields from ERA5 vertical profiles, when compared with a constant ELR. Simulations with the ECMWF land surface model, at 9‐km resolution, driven by ERA5 using different ELR corrections showed the added value of the methodology, but the impact of different ELR corrections is limited. However, the validity of the downscaling method in reducing temperature to station altitude suggests that there is sufficient generality for application at kilometer and subkilometer resolutions. By comparing the estimated representativity errors of observations with reanalysis, the improvements from ERAI to ERA5 are mainly visible in the random component of the error. Large systematic biases remain, which require further attention from the modeling and data assimilation, and limit the potential benefits of ELR corrections.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000984land surfacedownscalingreanalysislapse rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emanuel Dutra
Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater
Souhail Boussetta
Takuya Komori
Shoji Hirahara
Gianpaolo Balsamo
spellingShingle Emanuel Dutra
Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater
Souhail Boussetta
Takuya Komori
Shoji Hirahara
Gianpaolo Balsamo
Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
Earth and Space Science
land surface
downscaling
reanalysis
lapse rate
author_facet Emanuel Dutra
Joaquín Muñoz‐Sabater
Souhail Boussetta
Takuya Komori
Shoji Hirahara
Gianpaolo Balsamo
author_sort Emanuel Dutra
title Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
title_short Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
title_full Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
title_fullStr Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Lapse Rate for High‐Resolution Land Surface Downscaling: An Application to ERA5
title_sort environmental lapse rate for high‐resolution land surface downscaling: an application to era5
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth and Space Science
issn 2333-5084
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract In this study we derive the environmental lapse rate (ELR) from vertical profiles of temperature in the lower troposphere, applying it to downscale air temperature of the new European Centre For Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis ERA5, which replaces ERA‐Interim (ERAI). We focus over the western U.S. region, a data‐rich area with observations of daily maximum and minimum temperature (Global Historical Climatology Network) and snow depth and soil temperature. Observations indicate an ELR of −4.5 K·km−1 in the region, lower than the commonly used −6.5 K·km−1. ERA5 ELR agrees with the observational estimates, with some overestimation in winter and limitations in the diurnal variability. The elevation correction of ERA5 temperature using different ELR showed the benefits of deriving ELR fields from ERA5 vertical profiles, when compared with a constant ELR. Simulations with the ECMWF land surface model, at 9‐km resolution, driven by ERA5 using different ELR corrections showed the added value of the methodology, but the impact of different ELR corrections is limited. However, the validity of the downscaling method in reducing temperature to station altitude suggests that there is sufficient generality for application at kilometer and subkilometer resolutions. By comparing the estimated representativity errors of observations with reanalysis, the improvements from ERAI to ERA5 are mainly visible in the random component of the error. Large systematic biases remain, which require further attention from the modeling and data assimilation, and limit the potential benefits of ELR corrections.
topic land surface
downscaling
reanalysis
lapse rate
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000984
work_keys_str_mv AT emanueldutra environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
AT joaquinmunozsabater environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
AT souhailboussetta environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
AT takuyakomori environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
AT shojihirahara environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
AT gianpaolobalsamo environmentallapserateforhighresolutionlandsurfacedownscalinganapplicationtoera5
_version_ 1724642305332215808