The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention

The present study examined the effect of different vocabulary instruction methods on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Elementary and advanced EFL learners (N = 120), selected through convenience sampling, were randomly assigned to three conditions (i.e., six groups for the two leve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiva Kaivanpanah, Is’haaq Akbarian, Hamid Salimi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urmia University 2021-07-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
Online Access:http://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_121049_610e6e63aa08f0486898a36aaa69cf00.pdf
id doaj-921801efaf2b4e3ea5daf2721c176a16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-921801efaf2b4e3ea5daf2721c176a162021-07-03T04:13:49ZengUrmia UniversityIranian Journal of Language Teaching Research2322-12912322-12912021-07-019212914610.30466/IJLTR.2021.121049The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and RetentionShiva Kaivanpanah0Is’haaq Akbarian1Hamid Salimi2University of TehranUniversity of QomUniversity of Tehran, Alborz CampusThe present study examined the effect of different vocabulary instruction methods on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Elementary and advanced EFL learners (N = 120), selected through convenience sampling, were randomly assigned to three conditions (i.e., six groups for the two levels). The learners in the explicit group received vocabulary awareness-raising and pushed output activities. The implicit group was exposed to input flooding, while the modified-implicit group received the pushed output activity and input flooding. The vocabulary learning of the participants was measured using teacherdeveloped vocabulary tests. The results indicated that learners receiving explicit as well as modified-implicit activities outperformed those exposed to implicit instruction on vocabulary tests. This implies that awareness-raising as well as pushed output activities help learners notice, learn vocabulary better, and retain them longer. Several implications for teachers, materials developers, and syllabus designers on including pushed output activities with more involvement, and areas for further research are discussed.http://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_121049_610e6e63aa08f0486898a36aaa69cf00.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shiva Kaivanpanah
Is’haaq Akbarian
Hamid Salimi
spellingShingle Shiva Kaivanpanah
Is’haaq Akbarian
Hamid Salimi
The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
author_facet Shiva Kaivanpanah
Is’haaq Akbarian
Hamid Salimi
author_sort Shiva Kaivanpanah
title The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
title_short The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
title_full The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
title_fullStr The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Modified-Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning and Retention
title_sort effect of explicit, implicit, and modified-implicit instruction on efl learners’ vocabulary learning and retention
publisher Urmia University
series Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
issn 2322-1291
2322-1291
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The present study examined the effect of different vocabulary instruction methods on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Elementary and advanced EFL learners (N = 120), selected through convenience sampling, were randomly assigned to three conditions (i.e., six groups for the two levels). The learners in the explicit group received vocabulary awareness-raising and pushed output activities. The implicit group was exposed to input flooding, while the modified-implicit group received the pushed output activity and input flooding. The vocabulary learning of the participants was measured using teacherdeveloped vocabulary tests. The results indicated that learners receiving explicit as well as modified-implicit activities outperformed those exposed to implicit instruction on vocabulary tests. This implies that awareness-raising as well as pushed output activities help learners notice, learn vocabulary better, and retain them longer. Several implications for teachers, materials developers, and syllabus designers on including pushed output activities with more involvement, and areas for further research are discussed.
url http://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_121049_610e6e63aa08f0486898a36aaa69cf00.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shivakaivanpanah theeffectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
AT ishaaqakbarian theeffectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
AT hamidsalimi theeffectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
AT shivakaivanpanah effectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
AT ishaaqakbarian effectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
AT hamidsalimi effectofexplicitimplicitandmodifiedimplicitinstructiononefllearnersvocabularylearningandretention
_version_ 1721321306810482688