Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Purpose: Retaining quality of life in patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer remains paramount. As such, balancing the benefits of treatment against the effects of therapy on elderly patients is essential. The EORTC QLQ-ELD14 (ELD-14) is a validated questionnaire with a domain dedicated to b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nima Aghdam, Abigail Pepin, Michael Carrasquilla, Colin Johnson, Malika Danner, Marilyn Ayoob, Thomas Yung, Siyuan Lei, Brian T. Collins, Deepak Kumar, Simeng Suy, John Lynch, Sean P. Collins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01528/full
id doaj-923106f333a94d8788e2b10236e72901
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nima Aghdam
Abigail Pepin
Abigail Pepin
Michael Carrasquilla
Colin Johnson
Malika Danner
Marilyn Ayoob
Thomas Yung
Siyuan Lei
Brian T. Collins
Deepak Kumar
Simeng Suy
John Lynch
Sean P. Collins
spellingShingle Nima Aghdam
Abigail Pepin
Abigail Pepin
Michael Carrasquilla
Colin Johnson
Malika Danner
Marilyn Ayoob
Thomas Yung
Siyuan Lei
Brian T. Collins
Deepak Kumar
Simeng Suy
John Lynch
Sean P. Collins
Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Frontiers in Oncology
SBRT
prostate cancer
burden of disease
patient reported outcome (PRO)
quality of life
cyberknife
author_facet Nima Aghdam
Abigail Pepin
Abigail Pepin
Michael Carrasquilla
Colin Johnson
Malika Danner
Marilyn Ayoob
Thomas Yung
Siyuan Lei
Brian T. Collins
Deepak Kumar
Simeng Suy
John Lynch
Sean P. Collins
author_sort Nima Aghdam
title Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
title_short Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
title_full Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
title_fullStr Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
title_sort self-reported burden in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt)
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose: Retaining quality of life in patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer remains paramount. As such, balancing the benefits of treatment against the effects of therapy on elderly patients is essential. The EORTC QLQ-ELD14 (ELD-14) is a validated questionnaire with a domain dedicated to burden of illness and treatment in the elderly. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 is a validated questionnaire which measures urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms. This study reports trends in self-reported burden in patients with prostate cancer treated with SBRT and reveals convergence of self-reported burden with treatment related side effects obtained from the EPIC-26 questionnaire.Methods: All patients ≥70 years old, with localized prostate cancer treated with SBRT ± ADT at Medstar Georgetown University Hospital from 2013 to 2018 and had completed the ELD-14 were eligible for inclusion in this cross-sectional cohort study. Percentage of responses to questions related to disease and treatment burden were counted for each category (“not at all” and “a little” vs. “quite a bit” and “very much”). Additional demographic features were derived from available medical records. A total of 111 patients (median age of 74) responded to the ELD-14 questionnaire at onset of treatment and at the 2-year mark. Responses to EPIC questionnaires at matched follow-ups were scored and correlated with the self-reported burden domain of the ELD-14 using the Spearman correlation coefficient.Results: Number of patients reporting “quite a bit” or “very much” burden from prostate cancer was 6.3% prior to treatment. This was highest at 1-month (10.8%) and decreased to 9.0% at 24 months post-SBRT (X2 = 3.836, p = 0.6986). By comparison, 3.6 and 5.4% reported “quite a bit” or “very much” burden from treatment at start of treatment and 24 months, respectively (X2 = 1.046, p = 0.9838). Patient reported treatment burden was found to converge well with individual domains of EPIC-26. Patients undergoing ADT experienced more burden than their non-ADT counterparts.Conclusions: This cross-sectional study suggests a minority of patients reported high burden from their clinically localized prostate cancer or from their SBRT treatment. Self-reported burden converged well with lower EPIC scores in multiple domains.
topic SBRT
prostate cancer
burden of disease
patient reported outcome (PRO)
quality of life
cyberknife
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01528/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nimaaghdam selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT abigailpepin selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT abigailpepin selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT michaelcarrasquilla selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT colinjohnson selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT malikadanner selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT marilynayoob selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT thomasyung selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT siyuanlei selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT briantcollins selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT deepakkumar selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT simengsuy selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT johnlynch selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT seanpcollins selfreportedburdeninelderlypatientswithlocalizedprostatecancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
_version_ 1725097353954721792
spelling doaj-923106f333a94d8788e2b10236e729012020-11-25T01:29:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-01-01910.3389/fonc.2019.01528498730Self-Reported Burden in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Nima Aghdam0Abigail Pepin1Abigail Pepin2Michael Carrasquilla3Colin Johnson4Malika Danner5Marilyn Ayoob6Thomas Yung7Siyuan Lei8Brian T. Collins9Deepak Kumar10Simeng Suy11John Lynch12Sean P. Collins13Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesGeorge Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, United KingdomDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesBiotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United StatesPurpose: Retaining quality of life in patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer remains paramount. As such, balancing the benefits of treatment against the effects of therapy on elderly patients is essential. The EORTC QLQ-ELD14 (ELD-14) is a validated questionnaire with a domain dedicated to burden of illness and treatment in the elderly. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 is a validated questionnaire which measures urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms. This study reports trends in self-reported burden in patients with prostate cancer treated with SBRT and reveals convergence of self-reported burden with treatment related side effects obtained from the EPIC-26 questionnaire.Methods: All patients ≥70 years old, with localized prostate cancer treated with SBRT ± ADT at Medstar Georgetown University Hospital from 2013 to 2018 and had completed the ELD-14 were eligible for inclusion in this cross-sectional cohort study. Percentage of responses to questions related to disease and treatment burden were counted for each category (“not at all” and “a little” vs. “quite a bit” and “very much”). Additional demographic features were derived from available medical records. A total of 111 patients (median age of 74) responded to the ELD-14 questionnaire at onset of treatment and at the 2-year mark. Responses to EPIC questionnaires at matched follow-ups were scored and correlated with the self-reported burden domain of the ELD-14 using the Spearman correlation coefficient.Results: Number of patients reporting “quite a bit” or “very much” burden from prostate cancer was 6.3% prior to treatment. This was highest at 1-month (10.8%) and decreased to 9.0% at 24 months post-SBRT (X2 = 3.836, p = 0.6986). By comparison, 3.6 and 5.4% reported “quite a bit” or “very much” burden from treatment at start of treatment and 24 months, respectively (X2 = 1.046, p = 0.9838). Patient reported treatment burden was found to converge well with individual domains of EPIC-26. Patients undergoing ADT experienced more burden than their non-ADT counterparts.Conclusions: This cross-sectional study suggests a minority of patients reported high burden from their clinically localized prostate cancer or from their SBRT treatment. Self-reported burden converged well with lower EPIC scores in multiple domains.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.01528/fullSBRTprostate cancerburden of diseasepatient reported outcome (PRO)quality of lifecyberknife