Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma
Background. The objective was to assess the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma (MM) and uveal melanoma (UM) treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Methods. A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 25 dermatology departments...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Oncology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1908065 |
id |
doaj-9239c6cb4b0e4c60a1fe34b74a28e65e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claire Mignard Aurélie Deschamps Huvier André Gillibert Anne Bénédicte Duval Modeste Caroline Dutriaux Amir Khammari Marie-Françoise Avril Nora Kramkimel Laurent Mortier Pierre Marcant Thierry Lesimple Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste Candice Lesage Laurent Machet François Aubin Nicolas Meyer Nathalie Beneton Géraldine Jeudy Henri Montaudié Jean-Philippe Arnault Laetitia Visseaux Sabiha Trabelsi Mona Amini-Adle Eve Maubec Yannick Le Corre Dan Lipsker Ewa Wierzbicka-Hainaut Noémie Litrowski Andreea Stefan Florence Brunet-Possenti Marie-Thérèse Leccia Pascal Joly |
spellingShingle |
Claire Mignard Aurélie Deschamps Huvier André Gillibert Anne Bénédicte Duval Modeste Caroline Dutriaux Amir Khammari Marie-Françoise Avril Nora Kramkimel Laurent Mortier Pierre Marcant Thierry Lesimple Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste Candice Lesage Laurent Machet François Aubin Nicolas Meyer Nathalie Beneton Géraldine Jeudy Henri Montaudié Jean-Philippe Arnault Laetitia Visseaux Sabiha Trabelsi Mona Amini-Adle Eve Maubec Yannick Le Corre Dan Lipsker Ewa Wierzbicka-Hainaut Noémie Litrowski Andreea Stefan Florence Brunet-Possenti Marie-Thérèse Leccia Pascal Joly Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma Journal of Oncology |
author_facet |
Claire Mignard Aurélie Deschamps Huvier André Gillibert Anne Bénédicte Duval Modeste Caroline Dutriaux Amir Khammari Marie-Françoise Avril Nora Kramkimel Laurent Mortier Pierre Marcant Thierry Lesimple Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste Candice Lesage Laurent Machet François Aubin Nicolas Meyer Nathalie Beneton Géraldine Jeudy Henri Montaudié Jean-Philippe Arnault Laetitia Visseaux Sabiha Trabelsi Mona Amini-Adle Eve Maubec Yannick Le Corre Dan Lipsker Ewa Wierzbicka-Hainaut Noémie Litrowski Andreea Stefan Florence Brunet-Possenti Marie-Thérèse Leccia Pascal Joly |
author_sort |
Claire Mignard |
title |
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma |
title_short |
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma |
title_full |
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma |
title_sort |
efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic mucosal or uveal melanoma |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Oncology |
issn |
1687-8450 1687-8469 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Background. The objective was to assess the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma (MM) and uveal melanoma (UM) treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Methods. A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 25 dermatology departments in France. All patients with stage III-C to IV MM or UM who were treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 mAbs between 2008 and 2016 were included and compared after adjustment for main prognostic factors with a second cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST v. 1.1 criteria at Week 12. Results. Four-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients were included, 229 MM (151 immunotherapy, 78 chemotherapy) and 210 UM (100 immunotherapy, 110 chemotherapy). Response rates of MM patients treated with immunotherapy were 18/151 (11.9%; 95% CI:7.2%-18.2%), versus 11/78 (14.1%, 95% CI:7.3%-23.8%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.87). No tumor response was observed in UM patients treated with immunotherapy, versus 4/110 responses (3.6%, 95% CI:1.0-9.0%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.15). The adjusted overall survival (OS) of MM patients treated with immunotherapy was longer than that of patients treated with chemotherapy HR=0.62 (95% CI: 0.43-0.91), p=0.014, with an unadjusted median OS of 15.97 months [interquartile range (IQR)=6.89-27.11] and 8.82 months [IQR=5.02-14.92], respectively. The adjusted OS of UM patients treated with immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of patients treated with chemotherapy (HR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.66–1.44) p=0.92, with an unadjusted median OS of 13.38 months [IQR=6.03-29.57] and 11.02 months [IQR=6.13-23.93], respectively. Conclusion. Immunotherapy significantly improves OS for MM. The prognosis of metastatic UM remains poor. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1908065 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT clairemignard efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT aureliedeschampshuvier efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT andregillibert efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT annebenedicteduvalmodeste efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT carolinedutriaux efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT amirkhammari efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT mariefrancoiseavril efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT norakramkimel efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT laurentmortier efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT pierremarcant efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT thierrylesimple efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT carolinegaudymarqueste efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT candicelesage efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT laurentmachet efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT francoisaubin efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT nicolasmeyer efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT nathaliebeneton efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT geraldinejeudy efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT henrimontaudie efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT jeanphilippearnault efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT laetitiavisseaux efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT sabihatrabelsi efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT monaaminiadle efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT evemaubec efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT yannicklecorre efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT danlipsker efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT ewawierzbickahainaut efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT noemielitrowski efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT andreeastefan efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT florencebrunetpossenti efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT mariethereseleccia efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma AT pascaljoly efficacyofimmunotherapyinpatientswithmetastaticmucosaloruvealmelanoma |
_version_ |
1716806616515346432 |
spelling |
doaj-9239c6cb4b0e4c60a1fe34b74a28e65e2020-11-24T20:49:10ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Oncology1687-84501687-84692018-01-01201810.1155/2018/19080651908065Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal MelanomaClaire Mignard0Aurélie Deschamps Huvier1André Gillibert2Anne Bénédicte Duval Modeste3Caroline Dutriaux4Amir Khammari5Marie-Françoise Avril6Nora Kramkimel7Laurent Mortier8Pierre Marcant9Thierry Lesimple10Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste11Candice Lesage12Laurent Machet13François Aubin14Nicolas Meyer15Nathalie Beneton16Géraldine Jeudy17Henri Montaudié18Jean-Philippe Arnault19Laetitia Visseaux20Sabiha Trabelsi21Mona Amini-Adle22Eve Maubec23Yannick Le Corre24Dan Lipsker25Ewa Wierzbicka-Hainaut26Noémie Litrowski27Andreea Stefan28Florence Brunet-Possenti29Marie-Thérèse Leccia30Pascal Joly31Dermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, FranceDermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, FranceDepartment of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, FranceDermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Oncology Unit, Saint André Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, FranceOnco-Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, CRCINA, CIC1413, University Nantes, Nantes, FranceAPHP, Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital and University Paris Descartes, 89 rue Assas, 75006 Paris, FranceAPHP, Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital and University Paris Descartes, 89 rue Assas, 75006 Paris, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Huriez, Lille University Hospital, 59045 Lille, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Hôpital Huriez, Lille University Hospital, 59045 Lille, FranceDepartment of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Center, Rennes, FranceDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, La Timone Hospital, 265 rue St Pierre, 13885 Marseille Cedex 05, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital, 34295 Montpellier, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, CHRU de Tours et Université François Rabelais de Tours, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, EA3181, Besancon University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Toulouse III University – Paul Sabatier, Institut Universitaire du Cancer and Toulouse University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Le Mans hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Dijon University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Nice University Hospital, INSERM, U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Team 12, Nice, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 80054 Amiens Cedex 1, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Reims University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Grenoble University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69495 Pierre Bénite Cedex, FranceAPHP, Avicenne Hospital, Department of Dermatology, University Paris 13, Bobigny, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Angers University Hospital, UNAM, FranceFaculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Department of Dermatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Poitiers University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Monod General Hospital, le Havre, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Caen University Hospital, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, FranceDepartment of Dermatology, Grenoble University Hospital, FranceDermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, FranceBackground. The objective was to assess the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma (MM) and uveal melanoma (UM) treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Methods. A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 25 dermatology departments in France. All patients with stage III-C to IV MM or UM who were treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 mAbs between 2008 and 2016 were included and compared after adjustment for main prognostic factors with a second cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST v. 1.1 criteria at Week 12. Results. Four-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients were included, 229 MM (151 immunotherapy, 78 chemotherapy) and 210 UM (100 immunotherapy, 110 chemotherapy). Response rates of MM patients treated with immunotherapy were 18/151 (11.9%; 95% CI:7.2%-18.2%), versus 11/78 (14.1%, 95% CI:7.3%-23.8%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.87). No tumor response was observed in UM patients treated with immunotherapy, versus 4/110 responses (3.6%, 95% CI:1.0-9.0%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.15). The adjusted overall survival (OS) of MM patients treated with immunotherapy was longer than that of patients treated with chemotherapy HR=0.62 (95% CI: 0.43-0.91), p=0.014, with an unadjusted median OS of 15.97 months [interquartile range (IQR)=6.89-27.11] and 8.82 months [IQR=5.02-14.92], respectively. The adjusted OS of UM patients treated with immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of patients treated with chemotherapy (HR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.66–1.44) p=0.92, with an unadjusted median OS of 13.38 months [IQR=6.03-29.57] and 11.02 months [IQR=6.13-23.93], respectively. Conclusion. Immunotherapy significantly improves OS for MM. The prognosis of metastatic UM remains poor.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1908065 |