Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study

Abstract In capture–recapture studies, recycled individuals occur when individuals lose all of their tags and are recaptured as though they were new individuals. Typically, the effect of these recycled individuals is assumed negligible. Through a simulation‐based study of double‐tagging experiments,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily Malcolm‐White, Clive R. McMahon, Laura L. E. Cowen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-03-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6052
id doaj-923f76370caf4750abfdb025215ecf68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-923f76370caf4750abfdb025215ecf682021-03-02T05:09:10ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-03-011052377238410.1002/ece3.6052Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case studyEmily Malcolm‐White0Clive R. McMahon1Laura L. E. Cowen2Mathematics Middlebury College Middlebury VT USASydney Institute for Marine Science Mosman NSW AustraliaMathematics and Statistics University of Victoria Victoria BC CanadaAbstract In capture–recapture studies, recycled individuals occur when individuals lose all of their tags and are recaptured as though they were new individuals. Typically, the effect of these recycled individuals is assumed negligible. Through a simulation‐based study of double‐tagging experiments, we examined the effect of recycled individuals on parameter estimates in the Jolly–Seber model with tag loss (Cowen & Schwarz, 2006). We validated the simulation framework using long‐term census data of elephant seals. Including recycled individuals did not affect estimates of capture, survival, and tag‐retention probabilities. However, with low tag‐retention rates, high capture rates, and high survival rates, recycled individuals produced overestimates of population size. For the elephant seal case study, we found population size estimates to be between 8% and 53% larger when recycled individuals were ignored. Ignoring the effects of recycled individuals can cause large biases in population size estimates. These results are particularly noticeable in longer studies.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6052abundancecapture–mark–recapturecomplete tag lossdemographydouble taggingelephant seal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily Malcolm‐White
Clive R. McMahon
Laura L. E. Cowen
spellingShingle Emily Malcolm‐White
Clive R. McMahon
Laura L. E. Cowen
Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
Ecology and Evolution
abundance
capture–mark–recapture
complete tag loss
demography
double tagging
elephant seal
author_facet Emily Malcolm‐White
Clive R. McMahon
Laura L. E. Cowen
author_sort Emily Malcolm‐White
title Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
title_short Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
title_full Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
title_fullStr Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
title_full_unstemmed Complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study
title_sort complete tag loss in capture–recapture studies affects abundance estimates: an elephant seal case study
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Abstract In capture–recapture studies, recycled individuals occur when individuals lose all of their tags and are recaptured as though they were new individuals. Typically, the effect of these recycled individuals is assumed negligible. Through a simulation‐based study of double‐tagging experiments, we examined the effect of recycled individuals on parameter estimates in the Jolly–Seber model with tag loss (Cowen & Schwarz, 2006). We validated the simulation framework using long‐term census data of elephant seals. Including recycled individuals did not affect estimates of capture, survival, and tag‐retention probabilities. However, with low tag‐retention rates, high capture rates, and high survival rates, recycled individuals produced overestimates of population size. For the elephant seal case study, we found population size estimates to be between 8% and 53% larger when recycled individuals were ignored. Ignoring the effects of recycled individuals can cause large biases in population size estimates. These results are particularly noticeable in longer studies.
topic abundance
capture–mark–recapture
complete tag loss
demography
double tagging
elephant seal
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6052
work_keys_str_mv AT emilymalcolmwhite completetaglossincapturerecapturestudiesaffectsabundanceestimatesanelephantsealcasestudy
AT clivermcmahon completetaglossincapturerecapturestudiesaffectsabundanceestimatesanelephantsealcasestudy
AT lauralecowen completetaglossincapturerecapturestudiesaffectsabundanceestimatesanelephantsealcasestudy
_version_ 1724242706438291456