Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics

Model based decision support helps in optimizing therapy settings for individual patients while providing additional insight into a patient’s disease state through the identified model parameters. Using multiple models with different simulation focus and complexity allows adapting decision support t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kretschmer Jörn, Riedlinger Axel, Möller Knut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2015-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2015-0103
id doaj-92931d5a369f4a159671bd5213161348
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92931d5a369f4a159671bd52131613482021-09-06T19:19:22ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042015-09-011142843210.1515/cdbme-2015-0103cdbme-2015-0103Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanicsKretschmer Jörn0Riedlinger Axel1Möller Knut2Institute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, GermanyInstitute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, GermanyInstitute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, GermanyModel based decision support helps in optimizing therapy settings for individual patients while providing additional insight into a patient’s disease state through the identified model parameters. Using multiple models with different simulation focus and complexity allows adapting decision support to the current clinical situation and the available data. A previously presented set of numerical criteria allows selecting the best model based on fit quality, model complexity, and how well the parameter values are defined by the presented data. To systematically evaluate those criteria in an algorithm we have created insilico data sets using four different respiratory mechanics models with three different parameter settings each. Each of those artificial patients was ventilated with three different manoeuvres and the resulting data was used to identify the same models used to create the data. The selection algorithm was then presented with the results to select the best model. Not considering determinateness of the identified model parameters, the algorithm chose the same model that was used to create the data in 78%, a more complex model in 5% and a less complex model in 18% of all cases. When including the determinateness of model parameters in the decision process, the algorithm chose the same model in 42% of the cases and a less complex model in 56% of all cases. In 2% of the presented cases, no model complied with the required criteria.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2015-0103medical decision supportphysiological modellingrespiratory mechanicsmodel selection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kretschmer Jörn
Riedlinger Axel
Möller Knut
spellingShingle Kretschmer Jörn
Riedlinger Axel
Möller Knut
Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
medical decision support
physiological modelling
respiratory mechanics
model selection
author_facet Kretschmer Jörn
Riedlinger Axel
Möller Knut
author_sort Kretschmer Jörn
title Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
title_short Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
title_full Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
title_fullStr Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
title_sort evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
publisher De Gruyter
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
issn 2364-5504
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Model based decision support helps in optimizing therapy settings for individual patients while providing additional insight into a patient’s disease state through the identified model parameters. Using multiple models with different simulation focus and complexity allows adapting decision support to the current clinical situation and the available data. A previously presented set of numerical criteria allows selecting the best model based on fit quality, model complexity, and how well the parameter values are defined by the presented data. To systematically evaluate those criteria in an algorithm we have created insilico data sets using four different respiratory mechanics models with three different parameter settings each. Each of those artificial patients was ventilated with three different manoeuvres and the resulting data was used to identify the same models used to create the data. The selection algorithm was then presented with the results to select the best model. Not considering determinateness of the identified model parameters, the algorithm chose the same model that was used to create the data in 78%, a more complex model in 5% and a less complex model in 18% of all cases. When including the determinateness of model parameters in the decision process, the algorithm chose the same model in 42% of the cases and a less complex model in 56% of all cases. In 2% of the presented cases, no model complied with the required criteria.
topic medical decision support
physiological modelling
respiratory mechanics
model selection
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2015-0103
work_keys_str_mv AT kretschmerjorn evaluationofanalgorithmtochoosebetweencompetingmodelsofrespiratorymechanics
AT riedlingeraxel evaluationofanalgorithmtochoosebetweencompetingmodelsofrespiratorymechanics
AT mollerknut evaluationofanalgorithmtochoosebetweencompetingmodelsofrespiratorymechanics
_version_ 1717778761910321152