Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology

Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most extensively used biodegradable aliphatic polyester produced from renewable resources, such as corn starch. Due to its qualities, PLA is a leading biomaterial for numerous applications in medicine as well as in industry, replacing conventional petrochemical–ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brândușa Ghiban, Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu, Iulian Vasile Antoniac, Gabriel Jiga, Claudia Milea, Gabriela Petre, Cristina Gheorghe, Corneliu Munteanu, Bogdan Istrate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Coatings
Subjects:
PLA
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/6/633
id doaj-92ba7ba202a74023a6975f47b26cdfc6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92ba7ba202a74023a6975f47b26cdfc62021-06-01T01:03:54ZengMDPI AGCoatings2079-64122021-05-011163363310.3390/coatings11060633Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling TechnologyBrândușa Ghiban0Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu1Iulian Vasile Antoniac2Gabriel Jiga3Claudia Milea4Gabriela Petre5Cristina Gheorghe6Corneliu Munteanu7Bogdan Istrate8Department of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, J Building, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, RomaniaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Bulevardul Profesor Dimitrie Mangeron 67, 700050 Iași, RomaniaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Bulevardul Profesor Dimitrie Mangeron 67, 700050 Iași, RomaniaPolylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most extensively used biodegradable aliphatic polyester produced from renewable resources, such as corn starch. Due to its qualities, PLA is a leading biomaterial for numerous applications in medicine as well as in industry, replacing conventional petrochemical–based polymers. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the fracture behavior of pure PLA specimens in comparison with PLA particle insertions, (copper, aluminum and Graphene), after evaluation the mechanical properties, as well as the influence of filament angle deposition on these properties. In order to check if the filling density of the specimen influences the ultimate tensile stress (UTS), three different filling percentages (60%, 80%, and 100%) have been chosen in the experimental tests. A hierarchy concerning elongation / fiber heights after tensile testing was done. So, the highest elongation values were for simple PLA (about 4.1%), followed by PLA + Al insertion (3.2%–4%), PLA + graphene insertion (2.6%–4%) and the lowest values being for PLA with copper insertion (1.8%–2.7%). Regarding the fiber heights after fracture, the hierarchy was: the highest values was for PLA, then PLA + Al, PLA + grapheme and PLA + Cu. Finally, a correlation between fracture surfaces appearance and mechanical properties were established, being formulated the mechanism of fracture in according with filament angle deposition. Also, it was proposed a new method of evaluation of the fractured surface by measuring the dimensions of the filaments after printing Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and tensile testing.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/6/633fractographyPLAparticlesstereomicroscopyFDM technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brândușa Ghiban
Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu
Iulian Vasile Antoniac
Gabriel Jiga
Claudia Milea
Gabriela Petre
Cristina Gheorghe
Corneliu Munteanu
Bogdan Istrate
spellingShingle Brândușa Ghiban
Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu
Iulian Vasile Antoniac
Gabriel Jiga
Claudia Milea
Gabriela Petre
Cristina Gheorghe
Corneliu Munteanu
Bogdan Istrate
Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
Coatings
fractography
PLA
particles
stereomicroscopy
FDM technology
author_facet Brândușa Ghiban
Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu
Iulian Vasile Antoniac
Gabriel Jiga
Claudia Milea
Gabriela Petre
Cristina Gheorghe
Corneliu Munteanu
Bogdan Istrate
author_sort Brândușa Ghiban
title Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
title_short Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
title_full Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
title_fullStr Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
title_full_unstemmed Surface Characterization of Fracture in Polylactic Acid vs. PLA + Particle (Cu, Al, Graphene) Insertions by 3D Fused Deposition Modeling Technology
title_sort surface characterization of fracture in polylactic acid vs. pla + particle (cu, al, graphene) insertions by 3d fused deposition modeling technology
publisher MDPI AG
series Coatings
issn 2079-6412
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most extensively used biodegradable aliphatic polyester produced from renewable resources, such as corn starch. Due to its qualities, PLA is a leading biomaterial for numerous applications in medicine as well as in industry, replacing conventional petrochemical–based polymers. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the fracture behavior of pure PLA specimens in comparison with PLA particle insertions, (copper, aluminum and Graphene), after evaluation the mechanical properties, as well as the influence of filament angle deposition on these properties. In order to check if the filling density of the specimen influences the ultimate tensile stress (UTS), three different filling percentages (60%, 80%, and 100%) have been chosen in the experimental tests. A hierarchy concerning elongation / fiber heights after tensile testing was done. So, the highest elongation values were for simple PLA (about 4.1%), followed by PLA + Al insertion (3.2%–4%), PLA + graphene insertion (2.6%–4%) and the lowest values being for PLA with copper insertion (1.8%–2.7%). Regarding the fiber heights after fracture, the hierarchy was: the highest values was for PLA, then PLA + Al, PLA + grapheme and PLA + Cu. Finally, a correlation between fracture surfaces appearance and mechanical properties were established, being formulated the mechanism of fracture in according with filament angle deposition. Also, it was proposed a new method of evaluation of the fractured surface by measuring the dimensions of the filaments after printing Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and tensile testing.
topic fractography
PLA
particles
stereomicroscopy
FDM technology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/6/633
work_keys_str_mv AT brandusaghiban surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT nicoletaelisabetapascu surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT iulianvasileantoniac surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT gabrieljiga surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT claudiamilea surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT gabrielapetre surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT cristinagheorghe surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT corneliumunteanu surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
AT bogdanistrate surfacecharacterizationoffractureinpolylacticacidvsplaparticlecualgrapheneinsertionsby3dfuseddepositionmodelingtechnology
_version_ 1721413212855861248