Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas
Population decline, that took place in mountain areas of Italy since the 1950s, determined deep changes in both land use and landscape ecology. The maintenance of natural pastures, within the framework of a control program (Italian GAEC standard 4.1a of cross compliance), represents a relevant actio...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2011-08-01
|
Series: | Italian Journal of Agronomy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/362 |
id |
doaj-92ba90f7bae64efd82b0f4eb14f0f89f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-92ba90f7bae64efd82b0f4eb14f0f89f2020-11-24T21:50:41ZengPAGEPress PublicationsItalian Journal of Agronomy1125-47182039-68052011-08-0161s10.4081/ija.2011.6.s1.e11317Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areasCristina Potenza0Vincenzo Fedele1Agricultural Research Council (CRA)Agricultural Research Council (CRA)Population decline, that took place in mountain areas of Italy since the 1950s, determined deep changes in both land use and landscape ecology. The maintenance of natural pastures, within the framework of a control program (Italian GAEC standard 4.1a of cross compliance), represents a relevant action for a correct ecosystem management in order to preserve the floristic richness and, as a consequence, habitat biodiversity; it can also transform the pastures into a permanent feed resource not only for domestic livestock, but also for wild fauna. When the grazing activity is managed with rational criteria can be vital to preserve biodiversity, allowing the maintenance of those habitats in danger of disappearance. The aim of grazing management should be the preservation of habitat and biodiversity. The specific objective of the rule 4.1a of cross-compliance is to ensure a minimum level of maintenance and to avoid the decay of habitats through the prohibition to reduce the surface destined to permanent pastures.https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/362mountain areaspasturesgrazing resources |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cristina Potenza Vincenzo Fedele |
spellingShingle |
Cristina Potenza Vincenzo Fedele Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas Italian Journal of Agronomy mountain areas pastures grazing resources |
author_facet |
Cristina Potenza Vincenzo Fedele |
author_sort |
Cristina Potenza |
title |
Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
title_short |
Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
title_full |
Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of the GAEC cross-compliance standard Protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
title_sort |
effectiveness of the gaec cross-compliance standard protection of permanent pasture in relation to grazing and pasture conservation management in marginal mountain areas |
publisher |
PAGEPress Publications |
series |
Italian Journal of Agronomy |
issn |
1125-4718 2039-6805 |
publishDate |
2011-08-01 |
description |
Population decline, that took place in mountain areas of Italy since the 1950s, determined deep changes in both land use and landscape ecology. The maintenance of natural pastures, within the framework of a control program (Italian GAEC standard 4.1a of cross compliance), represents a relevant action for a correct ecosystem management in order to preserve the floristic richness and, as a consequence, habitat biodiversity; it can also transform the pastures into a permanent feed resource not only for domestic livestock, but also for wild fauna. When the grazing activity is managed with rational criteria can be vital to preserve biodiversity, allowing the maintenance of those habitats in danger of disappearance. The aim of grazing management should be the preservation of habitat and biodiversity. The specific objective of the rule 4.1a of cross-compliance is to ensure a minimum level of maintenance and to avoid the decay of habitats through the prohibition to reduce the surface destined to permanent pastures. |
topic |
mountain areas pastures grazing resources |
url |
https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/362 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristinapotenza effectivenessofthegaeccrosscompliancestandardprotectionofpermanentpastureinrelationtograzingandpastureconservationmanagementinmarginalmountainareas AT vincenzofedele effectivenessofthegaeccrosscompliancestandardprotectionofpermanentpastureinrelationtograzingandpastureconservationmanagementinmarginalmountainareas |
_version_ |
1725882318181105664 |