Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.

In this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Alba, Richard Levy, Rebecca Hufft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982
id doaj-92fcb76a3e7145f3b1d0bacbf6438438
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92fcb76a3e7145f3b1d0bacbf64384382021-05-14T04:30:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e024498210.1371/journal.pone.0244982Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.Christina AlbaRichard LevyRebecca HufftIn this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documenting both pattern and process. We must first know which species exist, and where (i.e., taxonomic and biogeographic patterns), before we can determine why they exist there (i.e., ecological and evolutionary processes). Floristic botanists often use collections-based approaches to elucidate biodiversity patterns, while plant ecologists use hypothesis-driven statistical approaches to describe underlying processes. Because of these different disciplinary histories and research goals, floristic botanists and plant ecologists often remain siloed in their work. Here, using a case study from an urban greenway in Colorado, USA, we illustrate that the collections-based, opportunistic sampling of floristic botanists is highly complementary to the transect- or plot-based sampling of plant ecologists. We found that floristic sampling captured a community species pool four times larger than that captured using ecological transects, with rarefaction and non-parametric species estimation indicating that it would be prohibitive to capture the "true" community species pool if constrained to sampling within transects. We further illustrate that the discrepancy in species pool size between approaches led to a different interpretation of the greenway's ecological condition in some cases (e.g., transects missed uncommon cultivated species escaping from nearby gardens) but not others (e.g., plant species distributions among functional groups were similar between species pools). Finally, we show that while using transects to estimate plant relative abundances necessarily trades off with a fuller assessment of the species pool, it is an indispensable indicator of ecosystem health, as evidenced by three non-native grasses contributing to 50% of plant cover along the highly modified urban greenway. We suggest that actively fostering collaborations between floristic botanists and ecologists can create new insights into the maintenance of species diversity at the community scale.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina Alba
Richard Levy
Rebecca Hufft
spellingShingle Christina Alba
Richard Levy
Rebecca Hufft
Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Christina Alba
Richard Levy
Rebecca Hufft
author_sort Christina Alba
title Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
title_short Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
title_full Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
title_fullStr Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
title_full_unstemmed Combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
title_sort combining botanical collections and ecological data to better describe plant community diversity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In this age of rapid biodiversity loss, we must continue to refine our approaches to describing variation in life on Earth. Combining knowledge and research tools from multiple disciplines is one way to better describe complex natural systems. Understanding plant community diversity requires documenting both pattern and process. We must first know which species exist, and where (i.e., taxonomic and biogeographic patterns), before we can determine why they exist there (i.e., ecological and evolutionary processes). Floristic botanists often use collections-based approaches to elucidate biodiversity patterns, while plant ecologists use hypothesis-driven statistical approaches to describe underlying processes. Because of these different disciplinary histories and research goals, floristic botanists and plant ecologists often remain siloed in their work. Here, using a case study from an urban greenway in Colorado, USA, we illustrate that the collections-based, opportunistic sampling of floristic botanists is highly complementary to the transect- or plot-based sampling of plant ecologists. We found that floristic sampling captured a community species pool four times larger than that captured using ecological transects, with rarefaction and non-parametric species estimation indicating that it would be prohibitive to capture the "true" community species pool if constrained to sampling within transects. We further illustrate that the discrepancy in species pool size between approaches led to a different interpretation of the greenway's ecological condition in some cases (e.g., transects missed uncommon cultivated species escaping from nearby gardens) but not others (e.g., plant species distributions among functional groups were similar between species pools). Finally, we show that while using transects to estimate plant relative abundances necessarily trades off with a fuller assessment of the species pool, it is an indispensable indicator of ecosystem health, as evidenced by three non-native grasses contributing to 50% of plant cover along the highly modified urban greenway. We suggest that actively fostering collaborations between floristic botanists and ecologists can create new insights into the maintenance of species diversity at the community scale.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244982
work_keys_str_mv AT christinaalba combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity
AT richardlevy combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity
AT rebeccahufft combiningbotanicalcollectionsandecologicaldatatobetterdescribeplantcommunitydiversity
_version_ 1721441307597996032