Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays
This paper proposes an optimisation strategy for the layout design of wave energy converter (WEC) arrays. Optimal layouts are sought so as to maximise the absorbed power given a minimum q-factor, the minimum distance between WECs, and an area of deployment. To guarantee an efficient optimisation, a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1262 |
id |
doaj-9332e28d37e24acda084f2a7c967bcfc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9332e28d37e24acda084f2a7c967bcfc2020-11-24T21:38:51ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732017-08-01109126210.3390/en10091262en10091262Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter ArraysPau Mercadé Ruiz0Vincenzo Nava1Mathew B. R. Topper2Pablo Ruiz Minguela3Francesco Ferri4Jens Peter Kofoed5Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Thomas Manns Vej 23, 9220 Aalborg, DenmarkTecnalia Research and Innovation, Energy and Environmental Division, Parque Tecnologico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, SpainInstitute for Energy Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, Scotland, UKTecnalia Research and Innovation, Energy and Environmental Division, Parque Tecnologico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, SpainDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Thomas Manns Vej 23, 9220 Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Thomas Manns Vej 23, 9220 Aalborg, DenmarkThis paper proposes an optimisation strategy for the layout design of wave energy converter (WEC) arrays. Optimal layouts are sought so as to maximise the absorbed power given a minimum q-factor, the minimum distance between WECs, and an area of deployment. To guarantee an efficient optimisation, a four-parameter layout description is proposed. Three different optimisation algorithms are further compared in terms of performance and computational cost. These are the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA), a genetic algorithm (GA) and the glowworm swarm optimisation (GSO) algorithm. The results show slightly higher performances for the latter two algorithms; however, the first turns out to be significantly less computationally demanding.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1262wave energy arraysarray layoutoptimisationevolution strategyswarm intelligence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pau Mercadé Ruiz Vincenzo Nava Mathew B. R. Topper Pablo Ruiz Minguela Francesco Ferri Jens Peter Kofoed |
spellingShingle |
Pau Mercadé Ruiz Vincenzo Nava Mathew B. R. Topper Pablo Ruiz Minguela Francesco Ferri Jens Peter Kofoed Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays Energies wave energy arrays array layout optimisation evolution strategy swarm intelligence |
author_facet |
Pau Mercadé Ruiz Vincenzo Nava Mathew B. R. Topper Pablo Ruiz Minguela Francesco Ferri Jens Peter Kofoed |
author_sort |
Pau Mercadé Ruiz |
title |
Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays |
title_short |
Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays |
title_full |
Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays |
title_fullStr |
Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays |
title_full_unstemmed |
Layout Optimisation of Wave Energy Converter Arrays |
title_sort |
layout optimisation of wave energy converter arrays |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
This paper proposes an optimisation strategy for the layout design of wave energy converter (WEC) arrays. Optimal layouts are sought so as to maximise the absorbed power given a minimum q-factor, the minimum distance between WECs, and an area of deployment. To guarantee an efficient optimisation, a four-parameter layout description is proposed. Three different optimisation algorithms are further compared in terms of performance and computational cost. These are the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA), a genetic algorithm (GA) and the glowworm swarm optimisation (GSO) algorithm. The results show slightly higher performances for the latter two algorithms; however, the first turns out to be significantly less computationally demanding. |
topic |
wave energy arrays array layout optimisation evolution strategy swarm intelligence |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1262 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paumercaderuiz layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays AT vincenzonava layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays AT mathewbrtopper layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays AT pabloruizminguela layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays AT francescoferri layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays AT jenspeterkofoed layoutoptimisationofwaveenergyconverterarrays |
_version_ |
1725934196231241728 |