The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
This review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate ant...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Infectious Disease Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849 |
id |
doaj-93ab8019c67d4af19a24e91b2e0ce763 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-93ab8019c67d4af19a24e91b2e0ce7632021-01-02T10:52:57ZengMDPI AGInfectious Disease Reports2036-74302036-74492017-03-019110.4081/idr.2017.68493688The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidenceSonali Coulter0Jason A. Roberts1Krispin Hajkowicz2Kate Halton3Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, BrisbaneBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane; Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, BrisbaneRoyal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, BrisbaneFaculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, BrisbaneThis review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. A systematic search was performed in key medical databases to identify papers published in English between 2005 and 2015 that examined the association between inappropriate prescribing and BSI mortality in adult patients. Only studies that included BSIs caused by ESKAPE (<em>Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Enterobacter</em> species) organisms were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE criteria and results combined using a narrative synthesis. We included 46 studies. Inappropriate prescribing was associated with an overall increase in mortality in BSI. In BSI caused by resistant gram positive organisms, such as methicillin resistant <em>S. aureus</em>, inappropriate therapy resulted in up to a 3-fold increase in mortality. In BSI caused by gram negative (GN) resistant organisms a much greater impact ranging from 3 to 25 fold increase in the risk of mortality was observed. While the overall quality of the studies is limited by design and the variation in the definition of appropriate prescribing, there appears to be some evidence to suggest that inappropriate prescribing leads to increased mortality in patients due to GN BSI. The highest impact of inappropriate prescribing was seen in patients with GN BSI, which may be a useful metric to monitor the impact of AMS interventions.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849Antimicrobial stewardshipbloodstream infectionmortalityantibiotic resistanceESKAPE organism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sonali Coulter Jason A. Roberts Krispin Hajkowicz Kate Halton |
spellingShingle |
Sonali Coulter Jason A. Roberts Krispin Hajkowicz Kate Halton The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence Infectious Disease Reports Antimicrobial stewardship bloodstream infection mortality antibiotic resistance ESKAPE organism |
author_facet |
Sonali Coulter Jason A. Roberts Krispin Hajkowicz Kate Halton |
author_sort |
Sonali Coulter |
title |
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
title_short |
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
title_full |
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
title_fullStr |
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
title_sort |
use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Infectious Disease Reports |
issn |
2036-7430 2036-7449 |
publishDate |
2017-03-01 |
description |
This review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. A systematic search was performed in key medical databases to identify papers published in English between 2005 and 2015 that examined the association between inappropriate prescribing and BSI mortality in adult patients. Only studies that included BSIs caused by ESKAPE (<em>Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Enterobacter</em> species) organisms were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE criteria and results combined using a narrative synthesis. We included 46 studies. Inappropriate prescribing was associated with an overall increase in mortality in BSI. In BSI caused by resistant gram positive organisms, such as methicillin resistant <em>S. aureus</em>, inappropriate therapy resulted in up to a 3-fold increase in mortality. In BSI caused by gram negative (GN) resistant organisms a much greater impact ranging from 3 to 25 fold increase in the risk of mortality was observed. While the overall quality of the studies is limited by design and the variation in the definition of appropriate prescribing, there appears to be some evidence to suggest that inappropriate prescribing leads to increased mortality in patients due to GN BSI. The highest impact of inappropriate prescribing was seen in patients with GN BSI, which may be a useful metric to monitor the impact of AMS interventions. |
topic |
Antimicrobial stewardship bloodstream infection mortality antibiotic resistance ESKAPE organism |
url |
http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sonalicoulter theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT jasonaroberts theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT krispinhajkowicz theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT katehalton theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT sonalicoulter useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT jasonaroberts useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT krispinhajkowicz useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence AT katehalton useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence |
_version_ |
1724355325785538560 |