The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence

This review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate ant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonali Coulter, Jason A. Roberts, Krispin Hajkowicz, Kate Halton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-03-01
Series:Infectious Disease Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849
id doaj-93ab8019c67d4af19a24e91b2e0ce763
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93ab8019c67d4af19a24e91b2e0ce7632021-01-02T10:52:57ZengMDPI AGInfectious Disease Reports2036-74302036-74492017-03-019110.4081/idr.2017.68493688The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidenceSonali Coulter0Jason A. Roberts1Krispin Hajkowicz2Kate Halton3Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, BrisbaneBurns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane; Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, BrisbaneRoyal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, BrisbaneFaculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, BrisbaneThis review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. A systematic search was performed in key medical databases to identify papers published in English between 2005 and 2015 that examined the association between inappropriate prescribing and BSI mortality in adult patients. Only studies that included BSIs caused by ESKAPE (<em>Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Enterobacter</em> species) organisms were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE criteria and results combined using a narrative synthesis. We included 46 studies. Inappropriate prescribing was associated with an overall increase in mortality in BSI. In BSI caused by resistant gram positive organisms, such as methicillin resistant <em>S. aureus</em>, inappropriate therapy resulted in up to a 3-fold increase in mortality. In BSI caused by gram negative (GN) resistant organisms a much greater impact ranging from 3 to 25 fold increase in the risk of mortality was observed. While the overall quality of the studies is limited by design and the variation in the definition of appropriate prescribing, there appears to be some evidence to suggest that inappropriate prescribing leads to increased mortality in patients due to GN BSI. The highest impact of inappropriate prescribing was seen in patients with GN BSI, which may be a useful metric to monitor the impact of AMS interventions.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849Antimicrobial stewardshipbloodstream infectionmortalityantibiotic resistanceESKAPE organism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonali Coulter
Jason A. Roberts
Krispin Hajkowicz
Kate Halton
spellingShingle Sonali Coulter
Jason A. Roberts
Krispin Hajkowicz
Kate Halton
The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
Infectious Disease Reports
Antimicrobial stewardship
bloodstream infection
mortality
antibiotic resistance
ESKAPE organism
author_facet Sonali Coulter
Jason A. Roberts
Krispin Hajkowicz
Kate Halton
author_sort Sonali Coulter
title The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
title_short The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
title_full The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
title_fullStr The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
title_full_unstemmed The use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
title_sort use of bloodstream infection mortality to measure the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions: assessing the evidence
publisher MDPI AG
series Infectious Disease Reports
issn 2036-7430
2036-7449
publishDate 2017-03-01
description This review sets out to evaluate the current evidence on the impact of inappropriate therapy on bloodstream infections (BSI) and associated mortality. Based on the premise that better prescribing practices should result in better patient outcomes, BSI mortality may be a useful metric to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. A systematic search was performed in key medical databases to identify papers published in English between 2005 and 2015 that examined the association between inappropriate prescribing and BSI mortality in adult patients. Only studies that included BSIs caused by ESKAPE (<em>Enterococcus faecium/faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Enterobacter</em> species) organisms were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE criteria and results combined using a narrative synthesis. We included 46 studies. Inappropriate prescribing was associated with an overall increase in mortality in BSI. In BSI caused by resistant gram positive organisms, such as methicillin resistant <em>S. aureus</em>, inappropriate therapy resulted in up to a 3-fold increase in mortality. In BSI caused by gram negative (GN) resistant organisms a much greater impact ranging from 3 to 25 fold increase in the risk of mortality was observed. While the overall quality of the studies is limited by design and the variation in the definition of appropriate prescribing, there appears to be some evidence to suggest that inappropriate prescribing leads to increased mortality in patients due to GN BSI. The highest impact of inappropriate prescribing was seen in patients with GN BSI, which may be a useful metric to monitor the impact of AMS interventions.
topic Antimicrobial stewardship
bloodstream infection
mortality
antibiotic resistance
ESKAPE organism
url http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/idr/article/view/6849
work_keys_str_mv AT sonalicoulter theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT jasonaroberts theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT krispinhajkowicz theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT katehalton theuseofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT sonalicoulter useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT jasonaroberts useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT krispinhajkowicz useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
AT katehalton useofbloodstreaminfectionmortalitytomeasuretheimpactofantimicrobialstewardshipinterventionsassessingtheevidence
_version_ 1724355325785538560