Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?

We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emile van der Zee, Helen Zulch, Daniel Mills
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3504025?pdf=render
id doaj-93ac541ee9a2473ea89116399956a149
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93ac541ee9a2473ea89116399956a1492020-11-25T01:14:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01711e4938210.1371/journal.pone.0049382Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?Emile van der ZeeHelen ZulchDaniel MillsWe investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3504025?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emile van der Zee
Helen Zulch
Daniel Mills
spellingShingle Emile van der Zee
Helen Zulch
Daniel Mills
Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Emile van der Zee
Helen Zulch
Daniel Mills
author_sort Emile van der Zee
title Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
title_short Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
title_full Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
title_fullStr Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
title_full_unstemmed Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?
title_sort word generalization by a dog (canis familiaris): is shape important?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3504025?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT emilevanderzee wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant
AT helenzulch wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant
AT danielmills wordgeneralizationbyadogcanisfamiliarisisshapeimportant
_version_ 1725155161471451136