Commentary: "An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind"—UG is still a viable hypothesis
Everett (2016b) criticizes The Phonological Mind thesis (Berent, 2013a, 2013b) on logical, methodological and empirical grounds. Most of Everett’s concerns are directed towards the hypothesis that the phonological grammar is constrained by universal grammatical (UG) principles. Contrary to Everett’s...
Main Author: | Iris Berent |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01029/full |
Similar Items
-
An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind
by: Daniel L. Everett
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Phonology without Universal Grammar
by: Diana eArchangeli, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Zulu phonology, tonology and tonal grammar.
by: Cope, Anthony Trevor.
Published: (2011) -
Chapter Speaker and quote reduced parenthetical clauses
by: Griffiths , James
Published: (2015) -
QED Reloaded: Towards a Pluralistic Formal Library of Mathematical Knowledge
by: Michael Kohlhase, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)