A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children

This article considers the neglected topic of the relationship between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, with regard to the participation rights of disabled children. It analyses key articles in both conventions and considers rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ralph Sandland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2017-09-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/955
id doaj-940416bda2a24d8686b0fa03172d4e51
record_format Article
spelling doaj-940416bda2a24d8686b0fa03172d4e512020-11-25T01:03:12ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032017-09-01539310310.17645/si.v5i3.955557A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled ChildrenRalph Sandland0School of Law, University of Nottingham, UKThis article considers the neglected topic of the relationship between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, with regard to the participation rights of disabled children. It analyses key articles in both conventions and considers relevant general comments from both convention committees (the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities), and their interpretation by academic contributors. The article argues that much work on this topic fails to develop an adequate understanding of power relations, and that the ‘social model of disability’ which underpins the disabilities convention, when applied to ‘childhood’ (as opposed to ‘children’) suggests that the implications of that convention for the participation rights of all children, not only disabled children, are profound. This is because the disabilities convention rejects the relevance of tests of capacity and ‘best interests’ for disabled adults, for reasons which are equally germane to disabled children, and children in general. The article concludes with discussion of the difficulties in implementing the insights derived from the analysis of the disabilities convention in substantive law in the absence of a right to freedom from age discrimination for children, and suggests other, less far-reaching, reforms that could be made this notwithstanding.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/955childhoodchildrendisabilityparticipationrightssocial model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ralph Sandland
spellingShingle Ralph Sandland
A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
Social Inclusion
childhood
children
disability
participation
rights
social model
author_facet Ralph Sandland
author_sort Ralph Sandland
title A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
title_short A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
title_full A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
title_fullStr A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
title_full_unstemmed A Clash of Conventions? Participation, Power and the Rights of Disabled Children
title_sort clash of conventions? participation, power and the rights of disabled children
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2017-09-01
description This article considers the neglected topic of the relationship between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, with regard to the participation rights of disabled children. It analyses key articles in both conventions and considers relevant general comments from both convention committees (the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities), and their interpretation by academic contributors. The article argues that much work on this topic fails to develop an adequate understanding of power relations, and that the ‘social model of disability’ which underpins the disabilities convention, when applied to ‘childhood’ (as opposed to ‘children’) suggests that the implications of that convention for the participation rights of all children, not only disabled children, are profound. This is because the disabilities convention rejects the relevance of tests of capacity and ‘best interests’ for disabled adults, for reasons which are equally germane to disabled children, and children in general. The article concludes with discussion of the difficulties in implementing the insights derived from the analysis of the disabilities convention in substantive law in the absence of a right to freedom from age discrimination for children, and suggests other, less far-reaching, reforms that could be made this notwithstanding.
topic childhood
children
disability
participation
rights
social model
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/955
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphsandland aclashofconventionsparticipationpowerandtherightsofdisabledchildren
AT ralphsandland clashofconventionsparticipationpowerandtherightsofdisabledchildren
_version_ 1725201741452935168