Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity.
Ocular dominance plasticity is a well-documented phenomenon allowing us to study properties of cortical maturation. Understanding this maturation might be an important step towards unravelling how cortical circuits function. However, it is still not fully understood which mechanisms are responsible...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-03-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006834 |
id |
doaj-942c2e3bb9e84fc1b76ce1317ff50df1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-942c2e3bb9e84fc1b76ce1317ff50df12021-04-21T15:11:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582019-03-01153e100683410.1371/journal.pcbi.1006834Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity.Jacopo BonoClaudia ClopathOcular dominance plasticity is a well-documented phenomenon allowing us to study properties of cortical maturation. Understanding this maturation might be an important step towards unravelling how cortical circuits function. However, it is still not fully understood which mechanisms are responsible for the opening and closing of the critical period for ocular dominance and how changes in cortical responsiveness arise after visual deprivation. In this article, we present a theory of ocular dominance plasticity. Following recent experimental work, we propose a framework where a reduction in inhibition is necessary for ocular dominance plasticity in both juvenile and adult animals. In this framework, two ingredients are crucial to observe ocular dominance shifts: a sufficient level of inhibition as well as excitatory-to-inhibitory synaptic plasticity. In our model, the former is responsible for the opening of the critical period, while the latter limits the plasticity in adult animals. Finally, we also provide a possible explanation for the variability in ocular dominance shifts observed in individual neurons and for the counter-intuitive shifts towards the closed eye.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006834 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jacopo Bono Claudia Clopath |
spellingShingle |
Jacopo Bono Claudia Clopath Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. PLoS Computational Biology |
author_facet |
Jacopo Bono Claudia Clopath |
author_sort |
Jacopo Bono |
title |
Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
title_short |
Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
title_full |
Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
title_fullStr |
Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
title_sort |
synaptic plasticity onto inhibitory neurons as a mechanism for ocular dominance plasticity. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Computational Biology |
issn |
1553-734X 1553-7358 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Ocular dominance plasticity is a well-documented phenomenon allowing us to study properties of cortical maturation. Understanding this maturation might be an important step towards unravelling how cortical circuits function. However, it is still not fully understood which mechanisms are responsible for the opening and closing of the critical period for ocular dominance and how changes in cortical responsiveness arise after visual deprivation. In this article, we present a theory of ocular dominance plasticity. Following recent experimental work, we propose a framework where a reduction in inhibition is necessary for ocular dominance plasticity in both juvenile and adult animals. In this framework, two ingredients are crucial to observe ocular dominance shifts: a sufficient level of inhibition as well as excitatory-to-inhibitory synaptic plasticity. In our model, the former is responsible for the opening of the critical period, while the latter limits the plasticity in adult animals. Finally, we also provide a possible explanation for the variability in ocular dominance shifts observed in individual neurons and for the counter-intuitive shifts towards the closed eye. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006834 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacopobono synapticplasticityontoinhibitoryneuronsasamechanismforoculardominanceplasticity AT claudiaclopath synapticplasticityontoinhibitoryneuronsasamechanismforoculardominanceplasticity |
_version_ |
1714667801477644288 |