Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome-wide homozygosity estimation from genomic data is becoming an increasingly interesting research topic. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for estimating individual homozygosity-by-descent based on the infor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McQuillan Ruth, Saftić Vanja, Kolčić Ivana, Vitart Veronique, Bellenguez Celine, Hayward Caroline, Polašek Ozren, Gyllensten Ulf, Wilson James F, Rudan Igor, Wright Alan F, Campbell Harry, Leutenegger Anne-Louise
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-02-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/139
id doaj-943319bb23ef4b38a24f1e7d03562867
record_format Article
spelling doaj-943319bb23ef4b38a24f1e7d035628672020-11-25T02:09:28ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642010-02-0111113910.1186/1471-2164-11-139Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic dataMcQuillan RuthSaftić VanjaKolčić IvanaVitart VeroniqueBellenguez CelineHayward CarolinePolašek OzrenGyllensten UlfWilson James FRudan IgorWright Alan FCampbell HarryLeutenegger Anne-Louise<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome-wide homozygosity estimation from genomic data is becoming an increasingly interesting research topic. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for estimating individual homozygosity-by-descent based on the information from human genome-wide scans rather than genealogies. We considered the four most commonly used methods and investigated their applicability to single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data in both a simulation study and by using the human genotyped data. A total of 986 inhabitants from the isolated Island of Vis, Croatia (where inbreeding is present, but no pedigree-based inbreeding was observed at the level of F > 0.0625) were included in this study. All individuals were genotyped with the Illumina HumanHap300 array with 317,503 SNP markers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Simulation data suggested that multi-point FEstim is the method most strongly correlated to true homozygosity-by-descent. Correlation coefficients between the homozygosity-by-descent estimates were high but only for inbred individuals, with nearly absolute correlation between single-point measures.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Deciding who is really inbred is a methodological challenge where multi-point approaches can be very helpful once the set of SNP markers is filtered to remove linkage disequilibrium. The use of several different methodological approaches and hence different homozygosity measures can help to distinguish between homozygosity-by-state and homozygosity-by-descent in studies investigating the effects of genomic autozygosity on human health.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/139
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author McQuillan Ruth
Saftić Vanja
Kolčić Ivana
Vitart Veronique
Bellenguez Celine
Hayward Caroline
Polašek Ozren
Gyllensten Ulf
Wilson James F
Rudan Igor
Wright Alan F
Campbell Harry
Leutenegger Anne-Louise
spellingShingle McQuillan Ruth
Saftić Vanja
Kolčić Ivana
Vitart Veronique
Bellenguez Celine
Hayward Caroline
Polašek Ozren
Gyllensten Ulf
Wilson James F
Rudan Igor
Wright Alan F
Campbell Harry
Leutenegger Anne-Louise
Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
BMC Genomics
author_facet McQuillan Ruth
Saftić Vanja
Kolčić Ivana
Vitart Veronique
Bellenguez Celine
Hayward Caroline
Polašek Ozren
Gyllensten Ulf
Wilson James F
Rudan Igor
Wright Alan F
Campbell Harry
Leutenegger Anne-Louise
author_sort McQuillan Ruth
title Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
title_short Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
title_full Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
title_sort comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2010-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome-wide homozygosity estimation from genomic data is becoming an increasingly interesting research topic. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for estimating individual homozygosity-by-descent based on the information from human genome-wide scans rather than genealogies. We considered the four most commonly used methods and investigated their applicability to single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data in both a simulation study and by using the human genotyped data. A total of 986 inhabitants from the isolated Island of Vis, Croatia (where inbreeding is present, but no pedigree-based inbreeding was observed at the level of F > 0.0625) were included in this study. All individuals were genotyped with the Illumina HumanHap300 array with 317,503 SNP markers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Simulation data suggested that multi-point FEstim is the method most strongly correlated to true homozygosity-by-descent. Correlation coefficients between the homozygosity-by-descent estimates were high but only for inbred individuals, with nearly absolute correlation between single-point measures.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Deciding who is really inbred is a methodological challenge where multi-point approaches can be very helpful once the set of SNP markers is filtered to remove linkage disequilibrium. The use of several different methodological approaches and hence different homozygosity measures can help to distinguish between homozygosity-by-state and homozygosity-by-descent in studies investigating the effects of genomic autozygosity on human health.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/139
work_keys_str_mv AT mcquillanruth comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT safticvanja comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT kolcicivana comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT vitartveronique comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT bellenguezceline comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT haywardcaroline comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT polasekozren comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT gyllenstenulf comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT wilsonjamesf comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT rudanigor comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT wrightalanf comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT campbellharry comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
AT leuteneggerannelouise comparativeassessmentofmethodsforestimatingindividualgenomewidehomozygositybydescentfromhumangenomicdata
_version_ 1724923547806072832