Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use

Background: Self-testing technology allows people to test themselves for chlamydia without professional support. This may result in reassurance and wider access to chlamydia testing, but anxiety could occur on receipt of positive results. This study aimed to identify factors important in understandi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachael Powell, Helen M. Pattison, John F. Marriott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/4/2/25
id doaj-9433e8588b4f47388f885490daf63c37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9433e8588b4f47388f885490daf63c372020-11-24T22:59:56ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322016-05-01422510.3390/healthcare4020025healthcare4020025Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test UseRachael Powell0Helen M. Pattison1John F. Marriott2School of Psychological Sciences & Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United KingdomSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United KingdomSchool of Pharmacy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, United KingdomBackground: Self-testing technology allows people to test themselves for chlamydia without professional support. This may result in reassurance and wider access to chlamydia testing, but anxiety could occur on receipt of positive results. This study aimed to identify factors important in understanding self-testing for chlamydia outside formal screening contexts, to explore the potential impacts of self-testing on individuals, and to identify theoretical constructs to form a Framework for future research and intervention development. Methods: Eighteen university students participated in semi-structured interviews; eleven had self-tested for chlamydia. Data were analysed thematically usingaFrameworkapproach. Results: Perceivedbenefitsofself-testingincludeditsbeingconvenient, anonymousandnotrequiringphysicalexamination. Therewasconcernabouttestaccuracyandsome participants lacked confidence in using vulvo-vaginal swabs. While some participants expressed concern about the absence of professional support, all said they would seek help on receiving a positive result. Factors identified in Protection Motivation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour, such as response efficacy and self-efficacy, were found to be highly salient to participants in thinking about self-testing. Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest that self-testing independentlyofformalhealthcaresystemsmaynomorenegativelyimpactpeoplethanbeingtested by health care professionals. Participants’ perceptions about self-testing behaviour were consistent with psychological theories. Findings suggest that interventions which increase confidence in using self-tests and that provide reassurance of test accuracy may increase self-test intentions.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/4/2/25chlamydiaself-testingProtection Motivation TheoryTheory of Planned Behaviourhome testing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rachael Powell
Helen M. Pattison
John F. Marriott
spellingShingle Rachael Powell
Helen M. Pattison
John F. Marriott
Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
Healthcare
chlamydia
self-testing
Protection Motivation Theory
Theory of Planned Behaviour
home testing
author_facet Rachael Powell
Helen M. Pattison
John F. Marriott
author_sort Rachael Powell
title Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
title_short Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
title_full Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
title_fullStr Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
title_sort perceptions of self-testing for chlamydia: understanding and predicting self-test use
publisher MDPI AG
series Healthcare
issn 2227-9032
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Background: Self-testing technology allows people to test themselves for chlamydia without professional support. This may result in reassurance and wider access to chlamydia testing, but anxiety could occur on receipt of positive results. This study aimed to identify factors important in understanding self-testing for chlamydia outside formal screening contexts, to explore the potential impacts of self-testing on individuals, and to identify theoretical constructs to form a Framework for future research and intervention development. Methods: Eighteen university students participated in semi-structured interviews; eleven had self-tested for chlamydia. Data were analysed thematically usingaFrameworkapproach. Results: Perceivedbenefitsofself-testingincludeditsbeingconvenient, anonymousandnotrequiringphysicalexamination. Therewasconcernabouttestaccuracyandsome participants lacked confidence in using vulvo-vaginal swabs. While some participants expressed concern about the absence of professional support, all said they would seek help on receiving a positive result. Factors identified in Protection Motivation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour, such as response efficacy and self-efficacy, were found to be highly salient to participants in thinking about self-testing. Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest that self-testing independentlyofformalhealthcaresystemsmaynomorenegativelyimpactpeoplethanbeingtested by health care professionals. Participants’ perceptions about self-testing behaviour were consistent with psychological theories. Findings suggest that interventions which increase confidence in using self-tests and that provide reassurance of test accuracy may increase self-test intentions.
topic chlamydia
self-testing
Protection Motivation Theory
Theory of Planned Behaviour
home testing
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/4/2/25
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaelpowell perceptionsofselftestingforchlamydiaunderstandingandpredictingselftestuse
AT helenmpattison perceptionsofselftestingforchlamydiaunderstandingandpredictingselftestuse
AT johnfmarriott perceptionsofselftestingforchlamydiaunderstandingandpredictingselftestuse
_version_ 1725643283910098944