Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab

Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As open innovation systems, living labs consist of various actors with each playing their specific role. Within this article, we will take an open innovation perspective by analyzing the knowledge spill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dimitri Schuurman, Lieven De Marez, Pieter Ballon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Carleton University 2013-11-01
Series:Technology Innovation Management Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_November2013.pdf
id doaj-94492d17ca8d4e2ebecc6bda6f87e27f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94492d17ca8d4e2ebecc6bda6f87e27f2020-11-25T01:06:10ZengCarleton UniversityTechnology Innovation Management Review1927-03212013-11-01November 2013: Living Labs2836Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLabDimitri SchuurmanLieven De MarezPieter BallonLiving labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As open innovation systems, living labs consist of various actors with each playing their specific role. Within this article, we will take an open innovation perspective by analyzing the knowledge spill-overs between living lab actors through three in-depth innovation case studies taking place within the LeYLab living lab in Kortrijk, Belgium. The results illustrate how living labs foster the three open innovation processes of exploration, exploitation, and retention. From our analysis, we conclude that living labs are particularly useful for exploration and, to a lesser extent, exploitation. In terms of retention, living labs seem to hold a large potential; however, the success and the nature of the innovation processes depend on the sustainability of living labs, the number of innovation cases, and the alignment of these cases with the living lab infrastructure. Based on these findings, a concrete set of guidelines is proposed for innovating in living labs and for setting up a living lab constellation. http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_November2013.pdfknowledge exchangeliving labsOpen innovationopen innovation networksuser innovation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dimitri Schuurman
Lieven De Marez
Pieter Ballon
spellingShingle Dimitri Schuurman
Lieven De Marez
Pieter Ballon
Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
Technology Innovation Management Review
knowledge exchange
living labs
Open innovation
open innovation networks
user innovation
author_facet Dimitri Schuurman
Lieven De Marez
Pieter Ballon
author_sort Dimitri Schuurman
title Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
title_short Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
title_full Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
title_fullStr Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
title_full_unstemmed Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab
title_sort open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: insights from the leylab
publisher Carleton University
series Technology Innovation Management Review
issn 1927-0321
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As open innovation systems, living labs consist of various actors with each playing their specific role. Within this article, we will take an open innovation perspective by analyzing the knowledge spill-overs between living lab actors through three in-depth innovation case studies taking place within the LeYLab living lab in Kortrijk, Belgium. The results illustrate how living labs foster the three open innovation processes of exploration, exploitation, and retention. From our analysis, we conclude that living labs are particularly useful for exploration and, to a lesser extent, exploitation. In terms of retention, living labs seem to hold a large potential; however, the success and the nature of the innovation processes depend on the sustainability of living labs, the number of innovation cases, and the alignment of these cases with the living lab infrastructure. Based on these findings, a concrete set of guidelines is proposed for innovating in living labs and for setting up a living lab constellation.
topic knowledge exchange
living labs
Open innovation
open innovation networks
user innovation
url http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_November2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrischuurman openinnovationprocessesinlivinglabinnovationsystemsinsightsfromtheleylab
AT lievendemarez openinnovationprocessesinlivinglabinnovationsystemsinsightsfromtheleylab
AT pieterballon openinnovationprocessesinlivinglabinnovationsystemsinsightsfromtheleylab
_version_ 1725190967271620608