Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration

<p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know little about how different transit time and turnover time are in r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: X. Lu, Y.-P. Wang, Y. Luo, L. Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-11-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf
id doaj-9458f6116fc84b3d8c3c7a4adac53f21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9458f6116fc84b3d8c3c7a4adac53f212020-11-24T21:47:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892018-11-01156559657210.5194/bg-15-6559-2018Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrationX. Lu0X. Lu1X. Lu2Y.-P. Wang3Y. Luo4Y. Luo5L. Jiang6School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USACSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, AustraliaCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, AustraliaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USADepartment for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USA<p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know little about how different transit time and turnover time are in representing carbon cycling through multiple compartments under a non-steady state. In this study, we estimate both C turnover time as defined by the conventional stock over flux and mean C transit time as defined by the mean age of C mass leaving the system. We incorporate them into the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model to estimate C turnover time and transit time in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Modelling analysis shows that both C turnover time and transit time increase with climate warming but decrease with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Warming increases C turnover time by 2.4 years and transit time by 11.8 years in 2100 relative to that at steady state in 1901. During the same period, rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] decreases C turnover time by 3.8 years and transit time by 5.5 years. Our analysis shows that 65&thinsp;% of the increase in global mean C transit time with climate warming results from the depletion of fast-turnover C pool. The remaining 35&thinsp;% increase results from accompanied changes in compartment C age structures. Similarly, the decrease in mean C transit time with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] results approximately equally from replenishment of C into fast-turnover C pool and subsequent decrease in compartment C age structure. Greatly different from the transit time, the turnover time, which does not account for changes in either C age structure or composition of respired C, underestimated impacts of warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] on C diagnostic time and potentially led to deviations in estimating land C sequestration in multi-compartmental ecosystems.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author X. Lu
X. Lu
X. Lu
Y.-P. Wang
Y. Luo
Y. Luo
L. Jiang
spellingShingle X. Lu
X. Lu
X. Lu
Y.-P. Wang
Y. Luo
Y. Luo
L. Jiang
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
Biogeosciences
author_facet X. Lu
X. Lu
X. Lu
Y.-P. Wang
Y. Luo
Y. Luo
L. Jiang
author_sort X. Lu
title Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
title_short Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
title_full Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
title_fullStr Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
title_sort ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric co<sub>2</sub> concentration
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2018-11-01
description <p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know little about how different transit time and turnover time are in representing carbon cycling through multiple compartments under a non-steady state. In this study, we estimate both C turnover time as defined by the conventional stock over flux and mean C transit time as defined by the mean age of C mass leaving the system. We incorporate them into the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model to estimate C turnover time and transit time in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Modelling analysis shows that both C turnover time and transit time increase with climate warming but decrease with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Warming increases C turnover time by 2.4 years and transit time by 11.8 years in 2100 relative to that at steady state in 1901. During the same period, rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] decreases C turnover time by 3.8 years and transit time by 5.5 years. Our analysis shows that 65&thinsp;% of the increase in global mean C transit time with climate warming results from the depletion of fast-turnover C pool. The remaining 35&thinsp;% increase results from accompanied changes in compartment C age structures. Similarly, the decrease in mean C transit time with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] results approximately equally from replenishment of C into fast-turnover C pool and subsequent decrease in compartment C age structure. Greatly different from the transit time, the turnover time, which does not account for changes in either C age structure or composition of respired C, underestimated impacts of warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] on C diagnostic time and potentially led to deviations in estimating land C sequestration in multi-compartmental ecosystems.</p>
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT ypwang ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT yluo ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT yluo ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
AT ljiang ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration
_version_ 1725898792226521088