Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration
<p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know little about how different transit time and turnover time are in r...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-9458f6116fc84b3d8c3c7a4adac53f21 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9458f6116fc84b3d8c3c7a4adac53f212020-11-24T21:47:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892018-11-01156559657210.5194/bg-15-6559-2018Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrationX. Lu0X. Lu1X. Lu2Y.-P. Wang3Y. Luo4Y. Luo5L. Jiang6School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USACSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, AustraliaCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, AustraliaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USADepartment for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011, USA<p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know little about how different transit time and turnover time are in representing carbon cycling through multiple compartments under a non-steady state. In this study, we estimate both C turnover time as defined by the conventional stock over flux and mean C transit time as defined by the mean age of C mass leaving the system. We incorporate them into the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model to estimate C turnover time and transit time in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Modelling analysis shows that both C turnover time and transit time increase with climate warming but decrease with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Warming increases C turnover time by 2.4 years and transit time by 11.8 years in 2100 relative to that at steady state in 1901. During the same period, rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] decreases C turnover time by 3.8 years and transit time by 5.5 years. Our analysis shows that 65 % of the increase in global mean C transit time with climate warming results from the depletion of fast-turnover C pool. The remaining 35 % increase results from accompanied changes in compartment C age structures. Similarly, the decrease in mean C transit time with rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] results approximately equally from replenishment of C into fast-turnover C pool and subsequent decrease in compartment C age structure. Greatly different from the transit time, the turnover time, which does not account for changes in either C age structure or composition of respired C, underestimated impacts of warming and rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] on C diagnostic time and potentially led to deviations in estimating land C sequestration in multi-compartmental ecosystems.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
X. Lu X. Lu X. Lu Y.-P. Wang Y. Luo Y. Luo L. Jiang |
spellingShingle |
X. Lu X. Lu X. Lu Y.-P. Wang Y. Luo Y. Luo L. Jiang Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
X. Lu X. Lu X. Lu Y.-P. Wang Y. Luo Y. Luo L. Jiang |
author_sort |
X. Lu |
title |
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration |
title_short |
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration |
title_full |
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration |
title_fullStr |
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration |
title_sort |
ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric co<sub>2</sub> concentration |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
<p>Ecosystem carbon (C) transit time is a critical diagnostic parameter to
characterize land C sequestration. This parameter has different variants in
the literature, including a commonly used turnover time. However, we know
little about how different transit time and turnover time are in representing
carbon cycling through multiple compartments under a non-steady state. In this
study, we estimate both C turnover time as defined by the conventional
stock over flux and mean C transit time as defined by the mean age of C mass
leaving the system. We incorporate them into the Community
Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model to estimate C turnover time
and transit time in response to climate warming and rising
atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Modelling analysis shows that both C turnover
time and transit time increase with climate warming but decrease with rising
atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]. Warming increases C turnover time by 2.4 years
and transit time by 11.8 years in 2100 relative to that at steady state in
1901. During the same period, rising atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] decreases C
turnover time by 3.8 years and transit time by 5.5 years. Our analysis shows
that 65 % of the increase in global mean C transit time with climate
warming results from the depletion of fast-turnover C pool. The remaining
35 % increase results from accompanied changes in compartment C age
structures. Similarly, the decrease in mean C transit time with rising
atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] results approximately equally from replenishment
of C into fast-turnover C pool and subsequent decrease in compartment C age
structure. Greatly different from the transit time, the turnover time, which
does not account for changes in either C age structure or composition of
respired C, underestimated impacts of warming and rising atmospheric
[CO<sub>2</sub>] on C diagnostic time and potentially led to deviations in
estimating land C sequestration in multi-compartmental ecosystems.</p> |
url |
https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6559/2018/bg-15-6559-2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT xlu ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT ypwang ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT yluo ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT yluo ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration AT ljiang ecosystemcarbontransitversusturnovertimesinresponsetoclimatewarmingandrisingatmosphericcosub2subconcentration |
_version_ |
1725898792226521088 |