Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study

Background In China, there is insufficient evidence to support that screening programs can detect breast cancer earlier and improve outcomes compared with patient self-reporting. Therefore, we compared the pathological characteristics at diagnosis between self-detected and screen-detected cases of i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qi Zhang, Lanjun Ding, Xuan Liang, Yuan Wang, Jiao Jiao, Wenli Lu, Xiaojing Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-04-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/4567.pdf
id doaj-94929ad0e69d4e41be40d7e54aabc1b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94929ad0e69d4e41be40d7e54aabc1b02020-11-24T22:34:56ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-04-016e456710.7717/peerj.4567Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective studyQi Zhang0Lanjun Ding1Xuan Liang2Yuan Wang3Jiao Jiao4Wenli Lu5Xiaojing Guo6Department of Breast Pathology and Lab, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Breast Pathology and Lab, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Breast Pathology and Lab, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaBackground In China, there is insufficient evidence to support that screening programs can detect breast cancer earlier and improve outcomes compared with patient self-reporting. Therefore, we compared the pathological characteristics at diagnosis between self-detected and screen-detected cases of invasive breast cancer at our institution and determined whether these characteristics were different after the program’s introduction (vs. prior to). Methods Three databases were selected (breast cancer diagnosed in 1995–2000, 2010, and 2015), which provided a total of 3,014 female patients with invasive breast cancer. The cases were divided into self-detected and screen-detected groups. The pathological characteristics were compared between the two groups and multiple imputation and complete randomized imputation were used to deal with missing data. Results Compared with patient self-reporting, screening was associated with the following factors: a higher percentage of stage T1 tumors (75.0% vs 17.1%, P = 0.109 in 1995–2000; 66.7% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001 in 2010; 67.8% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001 in 2015); a higher percentage of tumors with stage N0 lymph node status (67.3% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.007 in 2010); and a higher percentage of histologic grade I tumors (22.9% vs 13.9%, P = 0.017 in 2010). Conclusion Screen-detected breast cancer was associated with a greater number of favorable pathological characteristics. However, although screening had a beneficial role in early detection in China, we found fewer patients were detected by screening in this study compared with those in Western and Asian developed countries.https://peerj.com/articles/4567.pdfBreast cancerScreen-detectedSelf-detectedChinesePathological characteristics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qi Zhang
Lanjun Ding
Xuan Liang
Yuan Wang
Jiao Jiao
Wenli Lu
Xiaojing Guo
spellingShingle Qi Zhang
Lanjun Ding
Xuan Liang
Yuan Wang
Jiao Jiao
Wenli Lu
Xiaojing Guo
Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
PeerJ
Breast cancer
Screen-detected
Self-detected
Chinese
Pathological characteristics
author_facet Qi Zhang
Lanjun Ding
Xuan Liang
Yuan Wang
Jiao Jiao
Wenli Lu
Xiaojing Guo
author_sort Qi Zhang
title Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in Chinese women: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of pathological characteristics between self-detected and screen-detected invasive breast cancers in chinese women: a retrospective study
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Background In China, there is insufficient evidence to support that screening programs can detect breast cancer earlier and improve outcomes compared with patient self-reporting. Therefore, we compared the pathological characteristics at diagnosis between self-detected and screen-detected cases of invasive breast cancer at our institution and determined whether these characteristics were different after the program’s introduction (vs. prior to). Methods Three databases were selected (breast cancer diagnosed in 1995–2000, 2010, and 2015), which provided a total of 3,014 female patients with invasive breast cancer. The cases were divided into self-detected and screen-detected groups. The pathological characteristics were compared between the two groups and multiple imputation and complete randomized imputation were used to deal with missing data. Results Compared with patient self-reporting, screening was associated with the following factors: a higher percentage of stage T1 tumors (75.0% vs 17.1%, P = 0.109 in 1995–2000; 66.7% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001 in 2010; 67.8% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001 in 2015); a higher percentage of tumors with stage N0 lymph node status (67.3% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.007 in 2010); and a higher percentage of histologic grade I tumors (22.9% vs 13.9%, P = 0.017 in 2010). Conclusion Screen-detected breast cancer was associated with a greater number of favorable pathological characteristics. However, although screening had a beneficial role in early detection in China, we found fewer patients were detected by screening in this study compared with those in Western and Asian developed countries.
topic Breast cancer
Screen-detected
Self-detected
Chinese
Pathological characteristics
url https://peerj.com/articles/4567.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT qizhang comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT lanjunding comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT xuanliang comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT yuanwang comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT jiaojiao comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT wenlilu comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
AT xiaojingguo comparisonofpathologicalcharacteristicsbetweenselfdetectedandscreendetectedinvasivebreastcancersinchinesewomenaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725725691539881984