A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.

Impaired balance is common post stroke and can be assessed by means of force-platforms measuring center of pressure (COP) displacements during static standing, or more dynamically during lateral maximum weight shift (MWS). However, activities of daily life also include diagonal MWS and since force p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaretha M van Dijk, Sarah Meyer, Solveig Sandstad, Evelyne Wiskerke, Rhea Thuwis, Chesny Vandekerckhove, Charlotte Myny, Nitesh Ghosh, Hilde Beyens, Eddy Dejaeger, Geert Verheyden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5557488?pdf=render
id doaj-94cdda0fad66400d82e3d15baf920d40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94cdda0fad66400d82e3d15baf920d402020-11-25T01:42:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018302010.1371/journal.pone.0183020A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.Margaretha M van DijkSarah MeyerSolveig SandstadEvelyne WiskerkeRhea ThuwisChesny VandekerckhoveCharlotte MynyNitesh GhoshHilde BeyensEddy DejaegerGeert VerheydenImpaired balance is common post stroke and can be assessed by means of force-platforms measuring center of pressure (COP) displacements during static standing, or more dynamically during lateral maximum weight shift (MWS). However, activities of daily life also include diagonal MWS and since force platforms are nowadays commercially available, investigating lateral and diagonal MWS in a clinical setting might be feasible and clinically relevant. We investigated lateral and diagonal MWS while standing in patients with stroke (PwS) and healthy controls (HC), evaluated MWS towards the affected and the non-affected side for PwS and correlated MWS with measures of balance, gait and fear of falling. In a cross-sectional observational study including 36 ambulatory sub-acute inpatients and 32 age-matched HC, a force platform (BioRescue, RM Ingénierie, France) was used to measure lateral and diagonal MWS in standing. Clinical outcome measures collected were Berg Balance Scale and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS) for balance, 10-meter walk test (10MWT) for gait speed and Falls Efficacy Scale-international version for fear of falling. MWS for PwS towards the affected side was significantly smaller compared to HC (lateral: p = 0.029; diagonal-forward: p = 0.000). MWS for PwS was also significantly reduced towards the affected side in the diagonal-forward direction (p = 0.019) compared to the non-affected side of PwS. Strong correlations were found for MWS for PwS in the diagonal-forward direction towards the affected side, and clinical measures of balance (CBMS: r = 0.66) and gait speed (10MWT: r = 0.66). Our study showed that ambulatory sub-acute PwS, in comparison to HC, have decreased ability to shift their body weight diagonally forward in standing towards their affected side. This reduced ability is strongly related to clinical measures of balance and gait speed. Our results suggest that MWS in a diagonal-forward direction should receive attention in rehabilitation of ambulatory sub-acute PwS in an inpatient setting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5557488?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margaretha M van Dijk
Sarah Meyer
Solveig Sandstad
Evelyne Wiskerke
Rhea Thuwis
Chesny Vandekerckhove
Charlotte Myny
Nitesh Ghosh
Hilde Beyens
Eddy Dejaeger
Geert Verheyden
spellingShingle Margaretha M van Dijk
Sarah Meyer
Solveig Sandstad
Evelyne Wiskerke
Rhea Thuwis
Chesny Vandekerckhove
Charlotte Myny
Nitesh Ghosh
Hilde Beyens
Eddy Dejaeger
Geert Verheyden
A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Margaretha M van Dijk
Sarah Meyer
Solveig Sandstad
Evelyne Wiskerke
Rhea Thuwis
Chesny Vandekerckhove
Charlotte Myny
Nitesh Ghosh
Hilde Beyens
Eddy Dejaeger
Geert Verheyden
author_sort Margaretha M van Dijk
title A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
title_short A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
title_full A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
title_sort cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Impaired balance is common post stroke and can be assessed by means of force-platforms measuring center of pressure (COP) displacements during static standing, or more dynamically during lateral maximum weight shift (MWS). However, activities of daily life also include diagonal MWS and since force platforms are nowadays commercially available, investigating lateral and diagonal MWS in a clinical setting might be feasible and clinically relevant. We investigated lateral and diagonal MWS while standing in patients with stroke (PwS) and healthy controls (HC), evaluated MWS towards the affected and the non-affected side for PwS and correlated MWS with measures of balance, gait and fear of falling. In a cross-sectional observational study including 36 ambulatory sub-acute inpatients and 32 age-matched HC, a force platform (BioRescue, RM Ingénierie, France) was used to measure lateral and diagonal MWS in standing. Clinical outcome measures collected were Berg Balance Scale and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS) for balance, 10-meter walk test (10MWT) for gait speed and Falls Efficacy Scale-international version for fear of falling. MWS for PwS towards the affected side was significantly smaller compared to HC (lateral: p = 0.029; diagonal-forward: p = 0.000). MWS for PwS was also significantly reduced towards the affected side in the diagonal-forward direction (p = 0.019) compared to the non-affected side of PwS. Strong correlations were found for MWS for PwS in the diagonal-forward direction towards the affected side, and clinical measures of balance (CBMS: r = 0.66) and gait speed (10MWT: r = 0.66). Our study showed that ambulatory sub-acute PwS, in comparison to HC, have decreased ability to shift their body weight diagonally forward in standing towards their affected side. This reduced ability is strongly related to clinical measures of balance and gait speed. Our results suggest that MWS in a diagonal-forward direction should receive attention in rehabilitation of ambulatory sub-acute PwS in an inpatient setting.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5557488?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT margarethamvandijk acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT sarahmeyer acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT solveigsandstad acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT evelynewiskerke acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT rheathuwis acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT chesnyvandekerckhove acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT charlottemyny acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT niteshghosh acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT hildebeyens acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT eddydejaeger acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT geertverheyden acrosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT margarethamvandijk crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT sarahmeyer crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT solveigsandstad crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT evelynewiskerke crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT rheathuwis crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT chesnyvandekerckhove crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT charlottemyny crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT niteshghosh crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT hildebeyens crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT eddydejaeger crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
AT geertverheyden crosssectionalstudycomparinglateralanddiagonalmaximumweightshiftinpeoplewithstrokeandhealthycontrolsandthecorrelationwithbalancegaitandfearoffalling
_version_ 1725037354197975040