Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance

Farmers' decision to adopt new management or production system depends on production risk. Grain yield data was used to assess production risk in a field experiment composed of two cropping systems (CNV and ORG), each with eight subsystems (two levels each of crop rotation (2-yr and 4-yr), till...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah A. Jaradat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Agronomy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/426582
id doaj-94dfa630bafc4c6d8320b0d52f44cb3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94dfa630bafc4c6d8320b0d52f44cb3f2020-11-24T22:40:02ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81591687-81672011-01-01201110.1155/2011/426582426582Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield VarianceAbdullah A. Jaradat0United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267, USAFarmers' decision to adopt new management or production system depends on production risk. Grain yield data was used to assess production risk in a field experiment composed of two cropping systems (CNV and ORG), each with eight subsystems (two levels each of crop rotation (2-yr and 4-yr), tillage management (conventional, CT and strip, ST), and fertilizer input (fertilized, YF and non-fertilized, NF)). Statistical moments, cumulative yield (CY), temporal yield variance (TYV) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to assess the risk associated with adopting combinations of new management practices in CNV and ORG. The mean-variance-skewness (M-V-S) statistics derived from yield data separated all 16 subsystems into three clusters. Both cropping systems and clustered subsystems differed as to their ability to maintain a constant yield over years, displayed different yield cumulative probabilities, exhibited significant and different M-V-S relationships, and differed as to the reliability of estimating TYV as a function of CY. Results indicated that differences in management among cropping systems and subsystems contributed differently to the goal of achieving yield potential as estimated by the cumulative density function, and that certain low-input management practices caused a positive shift in yield distribution, and may lower TYV and reduce production risk.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/426582
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdullah A. Jaradat
spellingShingle Abdullah A. Jaradat
Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
International Journal of Agronomy
author_facet Abdullah A. Jaradat
author_sort Abdullah A. Jaradat
title Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
title_short Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
title_full Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
title_fullStr Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Mean-Variance-Skewness of Cumulative Crop Yield Impact Temporal Yield Variance
title_sort dynamics of mean-variance-skewness of cumulative crop yield impact temporal yield variance
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Agronomy
issn 1687-8159
1687-8167
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Farmers' decision to adopt new management or production system depends on production risk. Grain yield data was used to assess production risk in a field experiment composed of two cropping systems (CNV and ORG), each with eight subsystems (two levels each of crop rotation (2-yr and 4-yr), tillage management (conventional, CT and strip, ST), and fertilizer input (fertilized, YF and non-fertilized, NF)). Statistical moments, cumulative yield (CY), temporal yield variance (TYV) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to assess the risk associated with adopting combinations of new management practices in CNV and ORG. The mean-variance-skewness (M-V-S) statistics derived from yield data separated all 16 subsystems into three clusters. Both cropping systems and clustered subsystems differed as to their ability to maintain a constant yield over years, displayed different yield cumulative probabilities, exhibited significant and different M-V-S relationships, and differed as to the reliability of estimating TYV as a function of CY. Results indicated that differences in management among cropping systems and subsystems contributed differently to the goal of achieving yield potential as estimated by the cumulative density function, and that certain low-input management practices caused a positive shift in yield distribution, and may lower TYV and reduce production risk.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/426582
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahajaradat dynamicsofmeanvarianceskewnessofcumulativecropyieldimpacttemporalyieldvariance
_version_ 1725706163534692352