High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?
Abstract Background It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of thi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 |
id |
doaj-94dfea0954f0446ba1e399b4dff8a7e5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94dfea0954f0446ba1e399b4dff8a7e52020-11-25T01:20:26ZengBMCJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition1550-27832018-01-011511510.1186/s12970-018-0210-6High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone?Jose Antonio0Anya Ellerbroek1Cassandra Evans2Tobin Silver3Corey A. Peacock4Department of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern UniversityDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern UniversityDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern UniversityDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern UniversityDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern UniversityAbstract Background It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. Methods Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. Results During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm2) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm2). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm2) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm2). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. Conclusion Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6DXAT scoreBone mineral densityBody compositionProtein |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jose Antonio Anya Ellerbroek Cassandra Evans Tobin Silver Corey A. Peacock |
spellingShingle |
Jose Antonio Anya Ellerbroek Cassandra Evans Tobin Silver Corey A. Peacock High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition DXA T score Bone mineral density Body composition Protein |
author_facet |
Jose Antonio Anya Ellerbroek Cassandra Evans Tobin Silver Corey A. Peacock |
author_sort |
Jose Antonio |
title |
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_short |
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_full |
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_fullStr |
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_full_unstemmed |
High protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
title_sort |
high protein consumption in trained women: bad to the bone? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition |
issn |
1550-2783 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background It has been posited that the consumption of extra protein (> 0.8 g/kg/d) may be deleterious to bone mineral content. However, there is no direct evidence to show that consuming a high-protein diet results in a demineralization of the skeleton. Thus, the primary endpoint of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a high-protein diet affected various parameters of whole body and lumbar bone mineral content in exercise-trained women. Methods Twenty-four women volunteered for this 6-month investigation (n = 12 control, n = 12 high-protein). The control group was instructed to consume their habitual diet; however, the high-protein group was instructed to consume ≥2.2 g of protein per kilogram body weight daily (g/kg/d). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects were instructed to keep a food diary via the mobile app MyFitnessPal®. Exercise or activity level was not controlled. Subjects were asked to maintain their current levels of exercise. Results During the 6-month treatment period, there was a significant difference in protein intake between the control and high-protein groups (mean±SD; control: 1.5±0.3, high-protein: 2.8±1.1 g/kg/d); however, there were no differences in the consumption total calories, carbohydrate or fat. Whole body bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.22±0.08, post: 1.22±0.09 g/cm2) or high-protein group (pre: 1.25±0.11, post: 1.24±0.10 g/cm2). Similarly, lumbar bone mineral density did not change in the control (pre: 1.08±0.16, post: 1.05±0.13 g/cm2) or high-protein group (pre: 1.07±0.11, post: 1.08±0.12 g/cm2). In addition, there were no changes in whole body or lumbar T-Scores in either group. Furthermore, there were no changes in fat mass or lean body mass. Conclusion Despite an 87% higher protein intake (high-protein versus control), 6 months of a high-protein diet had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, T-scores, lean body mass or fat mass. |
topic |
DXA T score Bone mineral density Body composition Protein |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joseantonio highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT anyaellerbroek highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT cassandraevans highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT tobinsilver highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone AT coreyapeacock highproteinconsumptionintrainedwomenbadtothebone |
_version_ |
1725134167059988480 |