Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. S...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
2012-02-01
|
Series: | Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196 |
id |
doaj-94e177237e8840eabea83d22f8f9fe2a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94e177237e8840eabea83d22f8f9fe2a2020-11-25T01:27:13ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932012-02-01520Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist AccountCarla Bagnoli0University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous with other rational activities of self-constitution. However, its success is limited, and it costs are high: it protects the agent’s self by undermining the authority she has on her mental life. To this extent, self-deception is akin to alienation and estrangement. Its morally disturbing feature is its self-serving partiality. The self-deceptive agent settles on standards of justification that are lower than any rational agent would adopt, and thus loses grip on her agency. To capture the moral dimension of self-deception, I defend a Kantian account of the constraints that bear on self-constitution, and argue that it warrants more discriminating standards of agential autonomy than other contemporary minimalist views of self-government. http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196self-deceptionconstructivismself-goverment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carla Bagnoli |
spellingShingle |
Carla Bagnoli Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies self-deception constructivism self-goverment |
author_facet |
Carla Bagnoli |
author_sort |
Carla Bagnoli |
title |
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account |
title_short |
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account |
title_full |
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account |
title_fullStr |
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account |
title_sort |
self-deception and agential authority . constitutivist account |
publisher |
Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente |
series |
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies |
issn |
1972-1293 |
publishDate |
2012-02-01 |
description |
This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous with other rational activities of self-constitution. However, its success is limited, and it costs are high: it protects the agent’s self by undermining the authority she has on her mental life. To this extent, self-deception is akin to alienation and estrangement. Its morally disturbing feature is its self-serving partiality. The self-deceptive agent settles on standards of justification that are lower than any rational agent would adopt, and thus loses grip on her agency. To capture the moral dimension of self-deception, I defend a Kantian account of the constraints that bear on self-constitution, and argue that it warrants more discriminating standards of agential autonomy than other contemporary minimalist views of self-government.
|
topic |
self-deception constructivism self-goverment |
url |
http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carlabagnoli selfdeceptionandagentialauthorityconstitutivistaccount |
_version_ |
1725106127899721728 |