Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account

This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carla Bagnoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2012-02-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196
id doaj-94e177237e8840eabea83d22f8f9fe2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94e177237e8840eabea83d22f8f9fe2a2020-11-25T01:27:13ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932012-02-01520Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist AccountCarla Bagnoli0University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous with other rational activities of self-constitution. However, its success is limited, and it costs are high: it protects the agent’s self by undermining the authority she has on her mental life. To this extent, self-deception is akin to alienation and estrangement. Its morally disturbing feature is its self-serving partiality. The self-deceptive agent settles on standards of justification that are lower than any rational agent would adopt, and thus loses grip on her agency. To capture the moral dimension of self-deception, I defend a Kantian account of the constraints that bear on self-constitution, and argue that it warrants more discriminating standards of agential autonomy than other contemporary minimalist views of self-government. http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196self-deceptionconstructivismself-goverment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carla Bagnoli
spellingShingle Carla Bagnoli
Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
self-deception
constructivism
self-goverment
author_facet Carla Bagnoli
author_sort Carla Bagnoli
title Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
title_short Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
title_full Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
title_fullStr Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
title_full_unstemmed Self-Deception and Agential Authority . Constitutivist Account
title_sort self-deception and agential authority . constitutivist account
publisher Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
series Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
issn 1972-1293
publishDate 2012-02-01
description This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous with other rational activities of self-constitution. However, its success is limited, and it costs are high: it protects the agent’s self by undermining the authority she has on her mental life. To this extent, self-deception is akin to alienation and estrangement. Its morally disturbing feature is its self-serving partiality. The self-deceptive agent settles on standards of justification that are lower than any rational agent would adopt, and thus loses grip on her agency. To capture the moral dimension of self-deception, I defend a Kantian account of the constraints that bear on self-constitution, and argue that it warrants more discriminating standards of agential autonomy than other contemporary minimalist views of self-government.
topic self-deception
constructivism
self-goverment
url http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/196
work_keys_str_mv AT carlabagnoli selfdeceptionandagentialauthorityconstitutivistaccount
_version_ 1725106127899721728