Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

To improve the outcome of patients suffering from gastric cancer, a better understanding of underlying genetic and epigenetic events in this malignancy is required. Although CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability (MSI) have been shown to play pivotal roles in gastric c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Takeshi Nagasaka, Yoshiko Mori, Naosuke Yokomichi, Takashi Kawai, Tomokazu Fuji, Keisuke Kimura, Yuzo Umeda, Shunsuke Kagawa, Ajay Goel, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4488282?pdf=render
id doaj-94ea981835364b0590d95519ef2c0308
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94ea981835364b0590d95519ef2c03082020-11-25T01:42:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e013040910.1371/journal.pone.0130409Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.Kunitoshi ShigeyasuTakeshi NagasakaYoshiko MoriNaosuke YokomichiTakashi KawaiTomokazu FujiKeisuke KimuraYuzo UmedaShunsuke KagawaAjay GoelToshiyoshi FujiwaraTo improve the outcome of patients suffering from gastric cancer, a better understanding of underlying genetic and epigenetic events in this malignancy is required. Although CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability (MSI) have been shown to play pivotal roles in gastric cancer pathogenesis, the clinical significance of these events on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer remains unknown.This study included a patient cohort with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer who had surgical resections. A cohort of 68 gastric cancers was analyzed. CIMP and MSI statuses were determined by analyzing promoter CpG island methylation status of 28 genes/loci, and genomic instability at 10 microsatellite markers, respectively. A Cox's proportional hazards model was performed for multivariate analysis including age, stage, tumor differentiation, KRAS mutation status, and combined CIMP/MLH1 methylation status in relation to overall survival (OS).By multivariate analysis, longer OS was significantly correlated with lower pathologic stage (P = 0.0088), better tumor differentiation (P = 0.0267) and CIMP-high and MLH1 3' methylated status (P = 0.0312). Stratification of CIMP status with regards to MLH1 methylation status further enabled prediction of gastric cancer prognosis.CIMP and/or MLH1 methylation status may have a potential to be prognostic biomarkers for patients with gastric cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4488282?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
Takeshi Nagasaka
Yoshiko Mori
Naosuke Yokomichi
Takashi Kawai
Tomokazu Fuji
Keisuke Kimura
Yuzo Umeda
Shunsuke Kagawa
Ajay Goel
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
spellingShingle Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
Takeshi Nagasaka
Yoshiko Mori
Naosuke Yokomichi
Takashi Kawai
Tomokazu Fuji
Keisuke Kimura
Yuzo Umeda
Shunsuke Kagawa
Ajay Goel
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
Takeshi Nagasaka
Yoshiko Mori
Naosuke Yokomichi
Takashi Kawai
Tomokazu Fuji
Keisuke Kimura
Yuzo Umeda
Shunsuke Kagawa
Ajay Goel
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
author_sort Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
title Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
title_short Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
title_full Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
title_fullStr Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Significance of MLH1 Methylation and CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
title_sort clinical significance of mlh1 methylation and cpg island methylator phenotype as prognostic markers in patients with gastric cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description To improve the outcome of patients suffering from gastric cancer, a better understanding of underlying genetic and epigenetic events in this malignancy is required. Although CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability (MSI) have been shown to play pivotal roles in gastric cancer pathogenesis, the clinical significance of these events on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer remains unknown.This study included a patient cohort with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer who had surgical resections. A cohort of 68 gastric cancers was analyzed. CIMP and MSI statuses were determined by analyzing promoter CpG island methylation status of 28 genes/loci, and genomic instability at 10 microsatellite markers, respectively. A Cox's proportional hazards model was performed for multivariate analysis including age, stage, tumor differentiation, KRAS mutation status, and combined CIMP/MLH1 methylation status in relation to overall survival (OS).By multivariate analysis, longer OS was significantly correlated with lower pathologic stage (P = 0.0088), better tumor differentiation (P = 0.0267) and CIMP-high and MLH1 3' methylated status (P = 0.0312). Stratification of CIMP status with regards to MLH1 methylation status further enabled prediction of gastric cancer prognosis.CIMP and/or MLH1 methylation status may have a potential to be prognostic biomarkers for patients with gastric cancer.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4488282?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kunitoshishigeyasu clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT takeshinagasaka clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT yoshikomori clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT naosukeyokomichi clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT takashikawai clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT tomokazufuji clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT keisukekimura clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT yuzoumeda clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT shunsukekagawa clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT ajaygoel clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
AT toshiyoshifujiwara clinicalsignificanceofmlh1methylationandcpgislandmethylatorphenotypeasprognosticmarkersinpatientswithgastriccancer
_version_ 1725036650111696896