Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention

Background: Spatial attention relatively increases the power of neural 10-Hz alpha oscillations in the hemisphere ipsilateral to attention, and decreases alpha power in the contralateral hemisphere. For gamma oscillations (>40 Hz), the opposite effect has been observed. The functional roles of la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malte Wöstmann, Johannes Vosskuhl, Jonas Obleser, Christoph S. Herrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301074
id doaj-9505651d59904c3a8f004031b2115c73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9505651d59904c3a8f004031b2115c732021-03-19T07:12:00ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2018-07-01114752758Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attentionMalte Wöstmann0Johannes Vosskuhl1Jonas Obleser2Christoph S. Herrmann3Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Corresponding author. Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Maria-Goeppert Straße 9a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.Experimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence “Hearing4all”, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, GermanyExperimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence “Hearing4all”, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, GermanyBackground: Spatial attention relatively increases the power of neural 10-Hz alpha oscillations in the hemisphere ipsilateral to attention, and decreases alpha power in the contralateral hemisphere. For gamma oscillations (>40 Hz), the opposite effect has been observed. The functional roles of lateralised oscillations for attention are currently unclear. Hypothesis: If lateralised oscillations are functionally relevant for attention, transcranial stimulation of alpha versus gamma oscillations in one hemisphere should differentially modulate the accuracy of spatial attention to the ipsi-versus contralateral side. Methods: 20 human participants performed a dichotic listening task under continuous transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS, vs sham) at alpha (10 Hz) or gamma (47 Hz) frequency. On each trial, participants attended to four spoken numbers on the left or right ear, while ignoring numbers on the other ear. In order to stimulate a left temporo-parietal cortex region, which is known to show marked modulations of alpha power during auditory spatial attention, tACS (1 mA peak-to-peak amplitude) was applied at electrode positions TP7 and FC5 over the left hemisphere. Results: As predicted, unihemispheric alpha-tACS relatively decreased the recall of targets contralateral to stimulation, but increased recall of ipsilateral targets. Importantly, this spatial pattern of results was reversed for gamma-tACS. Conclusions: Results provide a proof of concept that transcranially stimulated oscillations can enhance spatial attention and facilitate attentional selection of speech. Furthermore, opposite effects of alpha versus gamma stimulation support the view that states of high alpha are incommensurate with active neural processing as reflected by states of high gamma.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301074Spatial attentionAuditoryTranscranial alternating current stimulationAlphaGammaNeural oscillation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Malte Wöstmann
Johannes Vosskuhl
Jonas Obleser
Christoph S. Herrmann
spellingShingle Malte Wöstmann
Johannes Vosskuhl
Jonas Obleser
Christoph S. Herrmann
Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
Brain Stimulation
Spatial attention
Auditory
Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Alpha
Gamma
Neural oscillation
author_facet Malte Wöstmann
Johannes Vosskuhl
Jonas Obleser
Christoph S. Herrmann
author_sort Malte Wöstmann
title Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
title_short Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
title_full Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
title_fullStr Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
title_full_unstemmed Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
title_sort opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background: Spatial attention relatively increases the power of neural 10-Hz alpha oscillations in the hemisphere ipsilateral to attention, and decreases alpha power in the contralateral hemisphere. For gamma oscillations (>40 Hz), the opposite effect has been observed. The functional roles of lateralised oscillations for attention are currently unclear. Hypothesis: If lateralised oscillations are functionally relevant for attention, transcranial stimulation of alpha versus gamma oscillations in one hemisphere should differentially modulate the accuracy of spatial attention to the ipsi-versus contralateral side. Methods: 20 human participants performed a dichotic listening task under continuous transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS, vs sham) at alpha (10 Hz) or gamma (47 Hz) frequency. On each trial, participants attended to four spoken numbers on the left or right ear, while ignoring numbers on the other ear. In order to stimulate a left temporo-parietal cortex region, which is known to show marked modulations of alpha power during auditory spatial attention, tACS (1 mA peak-to-peak amplitude) was applied at electrode positions TP7 and FC5 over the left hemisphere. Results: As predicted, unihemispheric alpha-tACS relatively decreased the recall of targets contralateral to stimulation, but increased recall of ipsilateral targets. Importantly, this spatial pattern of results was reversed for gamma-tACS. Conclusions: Results provide a proof of concept that transcranially stimulated oscillations can enhance spatial attention and facilitate attentional selection of speech. Furthermore, opposite effects of alpha versus gamma stimulation support the view that states of high alpha are incommensurate with active neural processing as reflected by states of high gamma.
topic Spatial attention
Auditory
Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Alpha
Gamma
Neural oscillation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301074
work_keys_str_mv AT maltewostmann oppositeeffectsoflateralisedtranscranialalphaversusgammastimulationonauditoryspatialattention
AT johannesvosskuhl oppositeeffectsoflateralisedtranscranialalphaversusgammastimulationonauditoryspatialattention
AT jonasobleser oppositeeffectsoflateralisedtranscranialalphaversusgammastimulationonauditoryspatialattention
AT christophsherrmann oppositeeffectsoflateralisedtranscranialalphaversusgammastimulationonauditoryspatialattention
_version_ 1724214128003776512