PARADIGM UNIFORMITY AND ANALOGY: THE CAPITALISTIC VERSUS MILITARISTIC DEBATE

In American English, /t/ in capitalistic is generally flapped while in militaristic it is not due to the influence of capi[ɾ]al and mili[tʰ]ary. This is called Paradigm Uniformity or PU (Steriade, 2000). Riehl (2003) presents evidence to refute PU which when reanalyzed supports PU.
 PU is th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Eddington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Murcia 2006-12-01
Series:International Journal of English Studies (IJES)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/48781
Description
Summary:In American English, /t/ in capitalistic is generally flapped while in militaristic it is not due to the influence of capi[ɾ]al and mili[tʰ]ary. This is called Paradigm Uniformity or PU (Steriade, 2000). Riehl (2003) presents evidence to refute PU which when reanalyzed supports PU.
 PU is thought to work in tandem with a rule of allophonic distribution, the nature of which is debated. An approach is suggested that eliminates the need for the rule versus PU dichotomy; allophonic distribution is carried out by analogy to stored items in the mental lexicon. Therefore, the influence of the pronunciation of capital on capitalistic is determined in the same way as the pronunciation of /t/ in monomorphemic words such as Mediterranean is. A number of analogical computer simulations provide evidence to support this notion.
ISSN:1578-7044