Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing

This paper compares vision, in general, and seeing God, in particular from two view points: Allame M.H.Tabatabai’s and M.Arabi’s, who are representatives of two school of Hikmat Mutaalie and Gnosticism. Subjects such as: heart as the place of receiving vision, the factors for incerasing heart’s rece...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F Rahimpur, S Yavari
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Isfahan 2010-03-01
Series:Metaphysik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-10&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-95ae991dab574ec5b21f41d656dc84e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95ae991dab574ec5b21f41d656dc84e32020-11-24T22:39:10ZfasUniversity of IsfahanMetaphysik2008-80862476-32762010-03-01136586Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and SeeingF Rahimpur0S Yavari1 university of isfahan university of isfahan This paper compares vision, in general, and seeing God, in particular from two view points: Allame M.H.Tabatabai’s and M.Arabi’s, who are representatives of two school of Hikmat Mutaalie and Gnosticism. Subjects such as: heart as the place of receiving vision, the factors for incerasing heart’s receiving capability of the inspirations, error in visionary knowledge, criteria for finding these errors and seeing God are investigated in this paper. A quick look at these two scholars’ definition of “vision” makes one think that these two views are complementary and point to the same direction. Also there are similarities in their approach to the subject of vision. For example, both agreed that the heart is the place to receive the vision and Aref can increase his heart’s receiving ability by some self-watching exercises. They both believe that it is possible for visionary knowledge to be erroneous for the probability of non-divine sources of revelations or inspirations and wrong interpretations of observations. However, there are important differences between the thinking methods of Allameh and Ibn Arabi, the most crucial of which is the different position of rational mind in their views. As for Allameh, unlike Ibn Arabi, it has a special importance as a cognitive tool and he refers to it as a criterion for the validity of visionary knowledgehttp://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-10&slc_lang=en&sid=1Allame M.H.Tabatabai M.Arabi Seeing God Vision Heart Wisdom.
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F Rahimpur
S Yavari
spellingShingle F Rahimpur
S Yavari
Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
Metaphysik
Allame M.H.Tabatabai
M.Arabi
Seeing God
Vision
Heart
Wisdom.
author_facet F Rahimpur
S Yavari
author_sort F Rahimpur
title Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
title_short Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
title_full Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
title_fullStr Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Views of Allame Tabatabai and M.Arabi on Vision and Seeing
title_sort comparison of views of allame tabatabai and m.arabi on vision and seeing
publisher University of Isfahan
series Metaphysik
issn 2008-8086
2476-3276
publishDate 2010-03-01
description This paper compares vision, in general, and seeing God, in particular from two view points: Allame M.H.Tabatabai’s and M.Arabi’s, who are representatives of two school of Hikmat Mutaalie and Gnosticism. Subjects such as: heart as the place of receiving vision, the factors for incerasing heart’s receiving capability of the inspirations, error in visionary knowledge, criteria for finding these errors and seeing God are investigated in this paper. A quick look at these two scholars’ definition of “vision” makes one think that these two views are complementary and point to the same direction. Also there are similarities in their approach to the subject of vision. For example, both agreed that the heart is the place to receive the vision and Aref can increase his heart’s receiving ability by some self-watching exercises. They both believe that it is possible for visionary knowledge to be erroneous for the probability of non-divine sources of revelations or inspirations and wrong interpretations of observations. However, there are important differences between the thinking methods of Allameh and Ibn Arabi, the most crucial of which is the different position of rational mind in their views. As for Allameh, unlike Ibn Arabi, it has a special importance as a cognitive tool and he refers to it as a criterion for the validity of visionary knowledge
topic Allame M.H.Tabatabai
M.Arabi
Seeing God
Vision
Heart
Wisdom.
url http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-10&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT frahimpur comparisonofviewsofallametabatabaiandmarabionvisionandseeing
AT syavari comparisonofviewsofallametabatabaiandmarabionvisionandseeing
_version_ 1725710449064804352