Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions

In this paper storm nowcasts in the terminal manoeuvring area (TMA) of Hong Kong International Airport are used to forecast deviation routes through a field of storms for arriving and departing aircraft. Storms were observed and nowcast by the nowcast system SWIRLS from the Hong Kong Observatory. St...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Hauf, Patrick Hupe, Manuela Sauer, Carl-Herbert Rokitansky, Jürgen Lang, Daniel Sacher, Pak Wai Chan, Ludmila Sakiew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borntraeger 2017-04-01
Series:Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0786
id doaj-95e1b9d0585049578f63a78224e2a894
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95e1b9d0585049578f63a78224e2a8942020-11-24T23:36:28ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29482017-04-0126218920610.1127/metz/2016/078687109Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditionsThomas HaufPatrick HupeManuela SauerCarl-Herbert RokitanskyJürgen LangDaniel SacherPak Wai ChanLudmila SakiewIn this paper storm nowcasts in the terminal manoeuvring area (TMA) of Hong Kong International Airport are used to forecast deviation routes through a field of storms for arriving and departing aircraft. Storms were observed and nowcast by the nowcast system SWIRLS from the Hong Kong Observatory. Storms were considered as no-go zones for aircraft and deviation routes were determined with the DIVSIM software package. Two days (21 and 22 May 2011) with 22 actual flown routes were investigated. Flights were simulated with a nowcast issued at the time an aircraft entered the TMA or departed from the airport. These flights were compared with a posteriori simulations, in which all storm fields were known and circumnavigated. Both types of simulated routes were then compared with the actual flown routes. The qualitative comparison of the various routes revealed generally good agreement. Larger differences were found in more complex situations with many active storms in the TMA. Route differences resulted primarily from air traffic control measures imposed such as holdings, slow-downs and shortcuts, causing the largest differences between the estimated and actual landing time. Route differences could be enhanced as aircraft might be forced to circumnavigate a storm ahead in a different sense. The use of route forecasts to assist controllers coordinating flights in a complex moving storm field is discussed. The study emphasises the important application of storm nowcasts in aviation meteorology.http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0786route forecastingadverse weatherstorm nowcastarrival management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Hauf
Patrick Hupe
Manuela Sauer
Carl-Herbert Rokitansky
Jürgen Lang
Daniel Sacher
Pak Wai Chan
Ludmila Sakiew
spellingShingle Thomas Hauf
Patrick Hupe
Manuela Sauer
Carl-Herbert Rokitansky
Jürgen Lang
Daniel Sacher
Pak Wai Chan
Ludmila Sakiew
Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
route forecasting
adverse weather
storm nowcast
arrival management
author_facet Thomas Hauf
Patrick Hupe
Manuela Sauer
Carl-Herbert Rokitansky
Jürgen Lang
Daniel Sacher
Pak Wai Chan
Ludmila Sakiew
author_sort Thomas Hauf
title Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
title_short Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
title_full Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
title_fullStr Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
title_full_unstemmed Aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
title_sort aircraft route forecasting under adverse weather conditions
publisher Borntraeger
series Meteorologische Zeitschrift
issn 0941-2948
publishDate 2017-04-01
description In this paper storm nowcasts in the terminal manoeuvring area (TMA) of Hong Kong International Airport are used to forecast deviation routes through a field of storms for arriving and departing aircraft. Storms were observed and nowcast by the nowcast system SWIRLS from the Hong Kong Observatory. Storms were considered as no-go zones for aircraft and deviation routes were determined with the DIVSIM software package. Two days (21 and 22 May 2011) with 22 actual flown routes were investigated. Flights were simulated with a nowcast issued at the time an aircraft entered the TMA or departed from the airport. These flights were compared with a posteriori simulations, in which all storm fields were known and circumnavigated. Both types of simulated routes were then compared with the actual flown routes. The qualitative comparison of the various routes revealed generally good agreement. Larger differences were found in more complex situations with many active storms in the TMA. Route differences resulted primarily from air traffic control measures imposed such as holdings, slow-downs and shortcuts, causing the largest differences between the estimated and actual landing time. Route differences could be enhanced as aircraft might be forced to circumnavigate a storm ahead in a different sense. The use of route forecasts to assist controllers coordinating flights in a complex moving storm field is discussed. The study emphasises the important application of storm nowcasts in aviation meteorology.
topic route forecasting
adverse weather
storm nowcast
arrival management
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0786
work_keys_str_mv AT thomashauf aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT patrickhupe aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT manuelasauer aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT carlherbertrokitansky aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT jurgenlang aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT danielsacher aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT pakwaichan aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
AT ludmilasakiew aircraftrouteforecastingunderadverseweatherconditions
_version_ 1725523555833085952